Do not appeal a UKPC Windscreen PCN (UKPC ARE BANNED BY THE DVLA - April/May 2018)

Quentin

Presumably they are very good customers, so may have to do much worse to be permanently excluded

Grimble

Something to do with a court case for fly tipping and data protection breach.

The_Deep

I cannot see how this fine will affect their BPA membership.

beamerguy

The_Deep wrote: »

I cannot see how this fine will affect their BPA membership.

But surely a BPA member must be squeaky clean for
membership ..... UKPC are not and I doubt they ever
will be .... it's the scammers way.

For the BPA to clean up it's act, they must be seen
to BE squeaky clean themselves and in reality they are NOT

twhitehousescat

beamerguy wrote: »

But surely a BPA member must be squeaky clean for
membership ..... UKPC are not and I doubt they ever
will be .... it's the scammers way.

For the BPA to clean up it's act, they must be seen
to BE sqeaky clean themselves and in reality they are NOT

the BPA is a members club , a club that members pay to enter ,

the BPA is a trade body set up to protect its members

full stop

beamerguy

twhitehousescat wrote: »

the BPA is a members club , a club that members pay to enter ,

the BPA is a trade body set up to protect its members

full stop

We know, that is why they are Gobi desert residents and
especially when they show rubbish like this

http://www.britishparking.co.uk/News/response-to-bbc-watchdog-responsible-parking-management-is-essential-for-a-better-parking-experience-

twhitehousescat

"Our Association remains committed to raising standards in the management of parking on private land, and our Code of Practice is continuously developed through consultation with all key stakeholders *including consumer groups and government to ensure we set high standards for our members, but of course, it could be better."

* amended to protect members

beamerguy

twhitehousescat wrote: »

"Our Association remains committed to raising standards in the management of parking on private land, and our Code of Practice is continuously developed through consultation with all key stakeholders *including consumer groups and government to ensure we set high standards for our members, but of course, it could be better."

* amended to protect members

YUP they must try much harder or stay in the Gobi desert

waamo

beamerguy wrote: »

But surely a BPA member must be squeaky clean for
membership ..... UKPC are not and I doubt they ever
will be .... it's the scammers way.

For the BPA to clean up it's act, they must be seen
to BE sqeaky clean themselves and in reality they are NOT

.

I must admit that made me laugh. I'm sure the BPA with it's convicted racist, sex offenders is squeaky clean.

Half_way

I've long held the belief that anyone/companny who has access to personal/private data should have some sort of check (CRB/DBS)
And if that person has any criminal or other conviction such as Fraud/violence/theft/fraud/dishonesty etc etc then they and their organisation should be prohibited form having access to personal data