We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Employer trying to avoid redundancy payment?
Comments
-
I do see your point Johno100, but it all depends on what the contract says and whether the person gives any value in a career ladder per se.
If the person was me and I only had a year or so to go to retirement I'd snap the job up for the reasons you've stated, if not however it's a demotion in real terms and their new supervisor, conscious of the fact they now have a member of staff under them that can do their job and is effectively 'waiting in the wings' could make their working life a total nightmare.0 -
Someone had offered me another post on the same hours and money but with less responsibility I'd have bitten their hand off.I wouldn’t
If it is a suitable alternative then the choice is take it or resign.
Many would take the role while looking for a more suitable replacement to keep the cash rolling in.
It is generally though it is easier to get a job if you have one.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards