We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Squirming BPA head on Watchdog just now

ratechaser
Posts: 1,674 Forumite

Well that was an enjoyable watch. Andrew Pester (appropriate name) trying to defend the indefensible again, this time the focus being on ANPR double dipping...
Wasn't even particularly harsh interviewing, would love to have seen him on Hard Talk!
Wasn't even particularly harsh interviewing, would love to have seen him on Hard Talk!
0
Comments
-
I've never seen such a useless idiot, I wonder what they pay him, what a Muppet!0
-
I hope someone has a video of the bit where the BPA chief admitted that the ANPR systems are not 100% accurate. Should be an automatic submission in any court case for double dipping!0
-
-
Yes it!!!8217;s was pretty bad shame they didn!!!8217;t slate other companies as we know parking eye are one of the worst.
How they hell do they expect everyday people to keep physical data proof of their vehicles whereabouts.
I got caught on double dipping in a company vehicle and claimed my companies tracker data proved the case and they dropped it. Lucky for me as our cars aren!!!8217;t tracked on commercial vehicles.
Their own camera data showed the lady in question proved here various visits and yet they don!!!8217;t drop the case as it!!!8217;s all a scam of Thrests hopping you bottle it and pay.0 -
ratechaser wrote: »Ah, but he was quick to emphasise what robust processes existed to deal with errors
Which was dispelled when it was pointed out that it was post PPC appeal and POPLA that PE had to capitulate with Watchdog involvement. And also the lady who had witnesses to show she was elsewhere too.0 -
Boy Pester was weak. The presenter Nikki even laughed about him at the end!PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD0 -
He stated one of the problems was the ANPR reading an O as an 0, what a load of cobblers how many VRN's are there that, that could happen?
The greatest number of vehicles have the AA 99 AAA format.
That Pester was awful at least Trouserfire could dodge a question professionally. He was just dodgy at filming with his phone!0 -
I hope someone has a video of the bit where the BPA chief admitted that the ANPR systems are not 100% accurate. Should be an automatic submission in any court case for double dipping!
He should be quoted in any POPLA appeal that questions the accuracy of ANPR cameras (double dip, or other cases) to try and head off POPLA coming back with this template put-down."In terms of the technology of the ANPR cameras themselves, the British Parking Association audits the ANPR systems in use by parking operators in order to ensure that they are in good working order and that the data collected is accurate. Independent research has found that the technology is generally accurate".Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street0 -
I wonder what his staff will say to him this morning when he gets to work and asks, "How do you think I did last night?"
Lots of coughing and clearing of throats!Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street0 -
Suspect there was some sort of legal threat in the background. The BBC are under a lot of scrutiny to keep their reporting fair and unbiased.
Dealing with media savvy organisations like the AA and the BPA will be under tight rules so as not to have yet another court case.This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards