We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Something fishy

MrsGizzard
Posts: 8 Forumite
Just decided to get a full buildings survey on my own home. The first local surveyor I called was the company who (unbeknownst to me) did our buyer’s valuation survey, only they sent someone from Rutland (about an hour away), even though their local office is in town. (And the Beast from the East was choking the A1).
They share offices and services with an estate agent who happens to be representing the people opposite, who can’t shift their house. Ours was marketed at £305K (although EA recommended £315K) and got full price at £305K after one viewing. Theirs is on at £325K. Anyway, the valuation came in at £295K.
They’re RICS, so independent. But I think it’s all a bit fishy. But can’t think what the point of suppressing our property price would be. But when discussing it with them, (until they realised it was them who’d done the survey), they were bemused because there’s some kind of 8% tolerance, which seemed not to have been applied.
Any thoughts?
They share offices and services with an estate agent who happens to be representing the people opposite, who can’t shift their house. Ours was marketed at £305K (although EA recommended £315K) and got full price at £305K after one viewing. Theirs is on at £325K. Anyway, the valuation came in at £295K.
They’re RICS, so independent. But I think it’s all a bit fishy. But can’t think what the point of suppressing our property price would be. But when discussing it with them, (until they realised it was them who’d done the survey), they were bemused because there’s some kind of 8% tolerance, which seemed not to have been applied.
Any thoughts?
0
Comments
-
Your house might be worth somewhere in the region of £295,000.
Plus or minus 8%, or thereabouts.
More, if two people want it. Possibly....
Hope that's clear now!... though I did find your post a little confused...
Conspiracy? No chance°
°But, then again, I might be your buyer :eek: or not :cool:0 -
Why did you get a survey on your own home? Surely the buyer would be doing that?0
-
MrsGizzard wrote: »Any thoughts?
Yes - two main ones...
1. It's strange to get a survey on your own house.
2. It's difficult to understand what you want people's thoughts on.0 -
As Rutland is England's smallest county and boasts not one but two reservoirs (Rutland Water and Eye Brook Reservoir) both well stocked with fish, you could be right that something could be "fishy".
Went to school with a lot of people from Rutland, they didn't have gills and only 4 fingers and a thumb on each hand.If you are querying your Council Tax band would you please state whether you are in England, Scotland or Wales0 -
So I know what it’s worth.0
-
Never mind. I suppose I!!!8217;m a bit stressed out so not making much sense. It!!!8217;s so odd here in Grantham. House prices are inflated due to lack of supply. But people aren!!!8217;t actually completing on purchases.
I feel like I may as well get my own survey so I know roughly what a lender really considers it worth. All I can get out of the buyers is the £295K answer, but no reason. I suppose it doesn!!!8217;t really matter. Just got a v bad feeling. Should listen to my gut and start again in Spring.0 -
MrsGizzard wrote: »Never mind. I suppose I!!!8217;m a bit stressed out so not making much sense. It!!!8217;s so odd here in Grantham. House prices are inflated due to lack of supply. But people aren!!!8217;t actually completing on purchases.
I feel like I may as well get my own survey so I know roughly what a lender really considers it worth. All I can get out of the buyers is the £295K answer, but no reason. I suppose it doesn!!!8217;t really matter. Just got a v bad feeling. Should listen to my gut and start again in Spring.
There is a contradiction there somewhere, or maybe lack of supply isn`t the problem?0 -
Crashy_Time wrote: »There is a contradiction there somewhere, or maybe lack of supply isn`t the problem?
I agree, some rather muddled thinking there... how can ''house prices be inflated'' if no one is able or willing to actually pay those prices?
Perhaps it would be more accurate to say that vendor's greedy, deluded expectations of what their houses are worth are inflated?0 -
I agree, some rather muddled thinking there... how can ''house prices be inflated'' if no one is able or willing to actually pay those prices?
Perhaps it would be more accurate to say that vendor's greedy, deluded expectations of what their houses are worth are inflated?
Cheap credit and herd sentiment inflated them, but they are suspended in mid air now, if Trump gets the rates and volatility up I can`t see it being good for bubble UK mortgages......
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/foxtons-profit-slump-latest-results-london-housing-market-sales-lettings-historic-lows-a8232051.html0 -
You!!!8217;ve been posting the same rubbish for a lot of years now, with the reasoning changing each time.
May I ask, given how spectacularly badly you called it a few years ago, do you not think that you are perhaps not very well clued up when it comes to predicting house prices?
I leveraged up eight years ago, spending seven figures on a flat in London. I had no expectation of making money on it, and thought it likely that I!!!8217;d lose, but was aware that forecasting was probably foolish.
Here we are now, it!!!8217;s gone up in value half a million pounds, which I am about to cash out. You would have told me not to buy, and do not seem to have learned anything.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.1K Spending & Discounts
- 244.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards