We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Ignorant Estate Agent - letter required?
Comments
-
This has been ongoing for 6 months, it's a probate property so I don't even live there.
I'm sure the buyers haven't grasped the fact that I'm in the best of positions.
There again, I don't know what carp the EA has been telling them.
If you're in a good position, you could - if it came to it - tell the cheeky b***** to b****** off.
I'm not sure if I mean the buyers or the estate agents. Or both!
Hope the buyer's solicitor charges them if the sale falls through.0 -
Just tell them to remarket, the buyer wont back out as too much investedDon't put your trust into an Experian score - it is not a number any bank will ever use & it is generally a waste of money to purchase it. They are also selling you insurance you dont need.0
-
The EA has chosen to ignore this (although has responded attaching the email) saying 'I think we need to renegotiate'.
...
Do I need to put this NO in a good old-fashioned letter, sent by Recorded Delivery?
Depending on the wording of your email they could be taking it to mean...
"Oh no, that's a shame."
"No, I don't think that's a very good idea, though as you're my appointed agent I'm always interested in your opinions."
"No, no way. Whatever you think, I'm not reducing the price. Please don't waste my time by even telling me what you think about it."
It sounds like you meant the third of these.
It sounds like the EA thought you meant one of the first two.0 -
Say no, again: (just e-mail, calm & polite). Then if they come back again say, ideally in person in their office in front of loads of their customers, "What part of F*ck *ff didn't you understand"..0
-
I'd guess that you have said NO to the reduced offer, and the buyer has said NO to going forward the current offer.
So the EA is trying to make one of you budge.
If you're not going to budge, you probably need to decide how you want to proceed and tell the EA. For example...
- Re-market the property
- Give current EA notice, and instruct another one
(Just repeating 'NO' probably won't really move things forward.)0 -
The agent wants a sale and their commission. They probably realise that you will dump them if this deal doesn't go ahead, so the only chance they have now is to persuade you to cave-in.
They may seem to be working for the other side, but they're really working for themselves, just as they have been all along!0 -
Sounds as if there's a lot more to this tale.My buyers have already notified the Council they are moving in, so bills are coming in their names.
This started nearly 2 months ago, and we still don't have an exchange date.
My advise is not to redirect anything until completion; it may be annoying to you but not half as annoying as it is to a seller receiving a PROSPECTIVE buyer's post and bills.0 -
An eail to the EA teling him
* the only renegotiation you will consider is upwards, and
* until the buyers commit to the agreed price you want the property back on the market.
Follow up with a phone call to the manager later n the day to ensure
a) he unerstands and
b) he actually IS putting the property back on the market0 -
I think it's time to bin the current EA off, and appoint someone else. From your posts it seems increasingly unlikely that the current sale will happen.
If the Op does this, they will be liable to pay two sets of estate agent fees. They'll be liable to the first estate agent which introduced the buyer (regardless of whether it is sole agency or not). And they'll be liable to the second agent.My buyers asked for a further reduction prior to exchange. The EA has chosen to ignore this (although has responded attaching the email) saying 'I think we need to renegotiate'.
Have you considered that there may be a good reason? Ask the estate agent why he thinks there is a need to renegotiate.
If the buyers have a good reason for asking for a reduction (e.g. the survey discovered a significant problem), then refusing to budge may be unreasonable and could result in the buyers pulling out. That is not a great scenario if you end up selling the property months later to someone else, and end up in exactly the same position when your second set of buyers have their survey done.
Obviously, the estate agent has to follow your instructions. So just ask them to tell the buyer there is no reduction if that is your decision. There is no need to mess around with letters etc.0 -
steampowered wrote: »If the Op does this, they will be liable to pay two sets of estate agent fees. They'll be liable to the first estate agent which introduced the buyer (regardless of whether it is sole agency or not). And they'll be liable to the second agent.
Eh?
They'll only be liable for a fee from agent1 if the sale reaches a successful completion (although some contracts will stipulate fees are due on exchange) From the long list of posts by the op documenting their sale it seems unlikely the sale to the present buyers is going to reach that point, imho.
If they choose to appoint a second agent to replace agent1 then they should do so on the basis that no fees are due to agent2, in the event the current buyer does finally get their act together and stop messing about.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards