Help and guidance please

[Deleted User]

Two hours to go. Note the wording files AND serves (my emphasis) you need to have a copy by 4pm too.

This is an unless order. The strike out is automatic unless complied with. No further order required.

Capt_Mainwaring

Hi

I've not received any letters or emails from BW today. Unless the letter they sent me the other day is their amended PoC, they haven't served me with anything.

I refuse to count my chickens at this stage though. Don't get me wrong, I hope this nightmare is finally at an end but I'm not celebrating just yet.

Lamilad

You're in a very similar situation to Logblahar who's thread is just a little further down the list from yours.

He received lengthy new PoC's and attached evidence the other day. Doesn't sound like you've got anything like that. So I'd suggest a call to the court first thing tomorrow to confirm the case has been struck.

I would also email the judge directly with the same question as it's unlikely the clerk will actually be able to tell you much.

skipton.cty.cm@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk

Capt_Mainwaring

Thanks Lamilad

I've just sent an email to the address you have confirmed to request that the Court strikes out the claims against me,

Lamilad

I would still make the phone call on the chance that they might be get the judge to deal with this today.

Capt_Mainwaring

Hi Lamilad


I've just spoken with the Court and they have received the amended PoC. I can only conclude that the letter they sent to me, is what they have filed with the Court, as I haven't received anything else from BW.


I was told that I will shortly receive a General Form of Judgment or Order for the other alleged contravention and BW have until 18/4 to respond to that.

[Deleted User]

Ok. Look at the defence and see if you need to amend/update to take account of the new argument.

You could email the PPC to check that the letter is their defence. Normally it should be bl**Dy obvious.

Coupon-mad

Even though one case is where the driver is known, and one is not, if these are both about the same contravention, car park, signage and defendant, you could write to DJ Wright and point out that the two separate claims have been filed for extremely similar circumstances (Claim No: xxxxxxx and Claim No: xxxxxxx). You could say that the defendant requests the cases are combined under Civil Procedure Rules 3.1(2)(g) and 3.1(2)(h) so that if there is to be a hearing, there be only one, to deal with both claims.

Capt_Mainwaring

Hi Johnersh

I've read through the letter I've received from BW Legal and the only point which concerns me is regarding the number of ticket machines in operation. BW refer to a parking machine log, which shows no ticket being purchased in respect of the vehicle. In response to my assertion that the machine was out of order on the site, they advise that there were two other machines in operation on the contravention date, which could have been utilised.

I know for a fact that two machines were not working. They were still not working when I returned weeks later. I have photographic proof to back this up. However, they will still clam that they were working! Where do I go from here?

Capt_Mainwaring

Hi CM

Can I email DJ Wright at Skipton Court to ask for one hearing?