UKPPO and BPA

Coupon-mad

I've taken pics with a date stamp on them last night

Good, now make those complaints with every possible agency. Including the IPC, they don't get enough complaints because they make it difficult to do so.

Johno100

pappa_golf wrote: »

they left the BPA 19/11/2015, this is 2 weeks short of 2 yrs ago HOW repeat HOW can the IPC have audited and accepted the signage !!!

No doubt it was a paper exercise with UKPPO just sending pictures of their standard signs to the IPC but never actually getting around to replacing the signs on site.

pappa_golf

Johno100 wrote: »

No doubt it was a paper exercise with UKPPO just sending pictures of their standard signs to the IPC but never actually getting around to replacing the signs on site.

that could not be classed as an audit , that would be a failure by the owners of the IPC

who are they?

anyway they cannot rely on signage , as the signage is clearly defective and not fit for ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Johno100

pappa_golf wrote: »

that could not be classed as an audit , that would be a failure by the owners of the IPC

who are they?

anyway they cannot rely on signage , as the signage is clearly defective and not fit for ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

You don't think with the comparatively small membership charges they levy they can afford to actually have boots on the ground carrying out site visits do you? Self-certification is the cost saving buzzword presently in vogue I believe.

pappa_golf

Johno100 wrote: »

You don't think with the comparatively small membership charges they levy they can afford to actually have boots on the ground carrying out site visits do you? Self-certification is the cost saving buzzword presently in vogue I believe.

remit of becoming an ADR probably states that they should have boots on the ground

Johno100

pappa_golf wrote: »

remit of becoming an ADR probably states that they should have boots on the ground

How's being an ADR got anything to do with it? Do POPLA have boots on the ground corroborating evidence submitted by PPCs?

pappa_golf

Johno100 wrote: »

How's being an ADR got anything to do with it? Do POPLA have boots on the ground corroborating evidence submitted by PPCs?

I suspect that the BPA /POPLa DO have boots on the ground , as they recently kicked out greater london keyholding , after viewing there signage , after I sent photos

GLK , stated that the signage had been changed , I disagreed , BPA sent investigator , GLK got p45

bliss ,,,,,,,,,,

toddis

Many thanks for all your help and advice, its much appreciated.

pappa_golf wrote: »

they left the BPA 19/11/2015, this is 2 weeks short of 2 yrs ago HOW repeat HOW can the IPC have audited and accepted the signage !!!

that photo is gold dust

Just for reference....

[FONT=&quot]Dear Mr xxxxxxx, [/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]Thank you for your e-mail. [/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]Whilst UK Parking Patrol Office are BPA members, they left our Approved Operator Scheme which deals with the issuing of tickets on private land on the 9 November 2015. [/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]Kind regards,[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Gemma Dorans[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]AOS Investigations Team [/FONT]

Umkomaas

Are you going to complain to David Dunford and Trading Standards? You’ll have SIP on the ropes if they get involved.

pappa_golf

toddis wrote: »

Many thanks for all your help and advice, its much appreciated.



Just for reference....

[FONT=&quot]Dear Mr xxxxxxx, [/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]Thank you for your e-mail. [/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]Whilst UK Parking Patrol Office are BPA members, they left our Approved Operator Scheme which deals with the issuing of tickets on private land on the 9 November 2015. [/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]Kind regards,[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Gemma Dorans[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]AOS Investigations Team [/FONT]

dear Gemma

why are they still displaying that they are members of the BPA AOS , as shown by this date stamped photo ?