UK Car Park Management try very hard to enable Shedule 4.

Quentin

Umkomaas wrote: »

No mystic powers, I just read every thread on this forum and from bergkamp’s other inputs on various other threads, it’s obvious he’s no wet-behind-the-ears newbie.

You have the advantage over most of us ( not just me) who haven't the time to not only read every single post and ability to recall every posters other posts elsewhere.

My comment was based purely on this thread which I made clear in #7

Quentin

Coupon-mad wrote: »

His other posts recently showed us that bergkamp knows a few scores.

snap, Umkomaas!

So what was going through your mind when answering the op in your #2??

Quentin

Coupon-mad wrote: »

His other posts recently showed us that bergkamp knows a few scores.

snap, Umkomaas!

So what was going through your mind when answering the op in your #2??

Coupon-mad wrote: »

OK - but still don't try IAS, you will lose. It's pointless.

Umkomaas

Quentin wrote: »

You have the advantage over most of us ( not just me) who haven't the time to not only read every single post and ability to recall every posters other posts elsewhere.

I’m not quite that good! .

I just spotted that a relative newbie (low posts count) seemed to know what he is talking about (across a variety of threads) and ‘logged’ his name.

That’s about as near to Mystic Meg as it gets!

bergkamp

:cool:

http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2017/12/is-bryn-holloway-lead-assessor-of.html

:beer:

hoohoo

bergkamp wrote: »

:cool:

http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2017/12/is-bryn-holloway-lead-assessor-of.html

:beer:

Very sad that someone who used to be a judge would behave this way

bergkamp

The RK has now received a ' Formal demand ' from UKCPM.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/8lim1ctsavqhx12/FORMAL_DEMAND%20REDACTED.pdf?dl=0


Interestingly, even though they ' won ' the IAS appeal, they will have the ' right to recover the charge from the driver ' after 28 days '..... :rotfl:

bergkamp

To be sent in response to the Formal Demand;

Data Protection Act 1998 – Section 10 Data Subject Notice

I am the registered keeper of the vehicle with registration mark XXXXXXX and received your Notice To Keeper (PCN) number 9999999.

You cannot use Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 to transfer liability to the registered keeper, as the NTK does not meet the criteria needed to enable the Act.

I then received your Formal Demand with the same reference number. This stated that you allegedly have the right to recover from the driver the parking charge amount.

I am under no obligation to name the driver.

You have been informed numerous times at the two appeal stages that I was not the driver and will not be naming them.

As a result, there is no legally-enforceable parking charge against me the registered keeper and no justification for you to pursue me. You must now delete all my personal information that you have obtained and hold . Your unreasonable and unlawful demand for payment is causing me significant distress and anxiety.

I demand that you immediately cease and desist from processing my personal data, except to inform me that you have complied with this demand. Any further processing of my personal data, including demands for payment or passing my personal data to any third party, will be considered harassment and a flagrant disregard of the DPA, which will be reported to DVLA and to your ATA, and may result in legal action against you for compensation or damages, including Exemplary or Punitive damages.

The DPA requires you to respond to this notice within 21 days to confirm that you have or will comply with my demands, or to explain why you have not or will not comply.

Anything need to be added?

Coupon-mad

Dropbox link didn't take me to a particular file?

DoaM

Perhaps the OP has removed that file now?