Not sure if can claim?

jpsartre

I'm aware of the regulations and the Sturgeon ruling but they don't support that compensation is due in this case IMO. For sure, article 6 applies but article 6 makes no reference to compensation. The Sturgeon ruling effectively says that a delay (note: an *actual* delay, not an expected delay) above 3 hours should be treated as a cancellation but that simply brings us back to the question of whether the OP's son was delayed (which I would argue he wasn't).

JPears

OK jps, I think we'll have to agree to disagree

jpsartre

No shame in that It's not like the case is clear cut either way (I think) so opinions are likely to differ.

JPears

It needs to go to court!