We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Not sure if can claim?
Comments
-
I'm aware of the regulations and the Sturgeon ruling but they don't support that compensation is due in this case IMO. For sure, article 6 applies but article 6 makes no reference to compensation. The Sturgeon ruling effectively says that a delay (note: an *actual* delay, not an expected delay) above 3 hours should be treated as a cancellation but that simply brings us back to the question of whether the OP's son was delayed (which I would argue he wasn't).0
-
OK jps, I think we'll have to agree to disagree
If you're new. read The FAQ and Vauban's Guide
The alleged Ringleader.........0 -
No shame in that
It's not like the case is clear cut either way (I think) so opinions are likely to differ. 0 -
It needs to go to court! If you're new. read The FAQ and Vauban's Guide
The alleged Ringleader.........0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards