We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Defending a claim in court

Options
13

Comments

  • KeithP
    KeithP Posts: 41,296 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    nikki5 wrote: »
    Would the court go after the business owner if they're able to get in touch the tattoo artist?
    No. The court does not go after anyone.

    The claimant must specify who they are claiming from.
    If they are claiming from the wrong person, then that 'wrong person' has no case to answer. If there is no other defendant, then that's the end of the case.

    It is however still important that that 'wrong person' robustly defends the claim, otherwise the claimant will win the case - by default if the defendant does not defend the claim at all.

    Are you the business owner?
  • Do you know why the claimant is pursuing you rather than the other person who actually did her tattoo? Is the claimant simply mistaken? If you didn't do the tattoo, how does the claimant know who you are?
  • bris
    bris Posts: 10,548 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I don't think the small claims court will deal with this anyway. In Scotland this would need to be heard in the sheriff court using a Summary cause summons.


    Not sure what the English equivalent would be. The small claims deals in actual loss, they don't do personal injury.
  • Without seeing the particulars of claim verbatim (they may indeed be rubbish!) who can say.
  • KeithP wrote: »
    No. The court does not go after anyone.
    The claimant must specify who they are claiming from.
    If they are claiming from the wrong person, then that 'wrong person' has no case to answer. If there is no other defendant, then that's the end of the case.
    It is however still important that that 'wrong person' robustly defends the claim, otherwise the claimant will win the case - by default if the defendant does not defend the claim at all.
    Are you the business owner?
    No, I'm not, but the owner is obviously aware of the issue and he's asked me to keep him updated. Do you know if the case would still go to court once I respond?
  • KeithP
    KeithP Posts: 41,296 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    nikki5 wrote: »
    Do you know if the case would still go to court once I respond?
    Respond to what? What have you received?

    Even if you have received papers from HMCS, and complete and return them, if the claimant does not pay a hearing fee there will be no court case.

    So the answer to your question is - no-one can possibly say.

    Have you received official papers from the court?

    Many posters have asked, why won't you post exactly what has been claimed?
  • DoaM
    DoaM Posts: 11,863 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showpost.php?p=64350585&postcount=2

    Whilst that is related to defending a private parking invoice court claim, the process is exactly the same for defending any small claim.
  • vikingaero
    vikingaero Posts: 10,920 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Could be something worth passing on to your Insurers if you have public liability or legal expenses cover?
    The man without a signature.
  • unholyangel
    unholyangel Posts: 16,866 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    bris wrote: »
    I don't think the small claims court will deal with this anyway. In Scotland this would need to be heard in the sheriff court using a Summary cause summons.


    Not sure what the English equivalent would be. The small claims deals in actual loss, they don't do personal injury.

    Small claims can deal with personal injury but the financial limit is different. They just increased the limits earlier this year actually. Previously I think it was £3000 for RTA personal injury claims and £1000 for all other personal injury claims. Now I think its £5000 for RTA claims and £2000 for all others.

    I suppose it depends how much they are claiming.


    There is also a possibility the business owner could have liability. It will depend on the exact set up not only between the shop & artist but also the shop & customer.

    But if the OP is neither the owner or the artist involved, I'd just respond that theres no case to answer, their claim has no basis in law as you are not the owner of the shop where the tattoo took place nor are you the artist who tattoo'd the claimant.
    You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride
  • IAmWales
    IAmWales Posts: 2,024 Forumite
    What is the tattoo artist that did the work doing about this? It comes across that they've all left you to it, when you're the one party that shouldn't be involved!

    bris, this type of claim can be heard in small claims. I've known a few claims for hairdressing mess ups, in one case the claimant was awarded £5,000 for both the costs of repairing the work and for personal injury.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.