We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Walked out of job.
Comments
-
From someone who just walked out? it will be filed in the usual manner...OldMotherTucker wrote: »I doubt it - the manager will not want me back, repeating to members of staff some of the stuff she has said to me. I'm happy to think she's sh1tt1ng a brick thinking I'm going to make some sort of formal complaint - it's funny how quickly the freezer door has been fixed!:rotfl:
0 -
From someone who just walked out? it will be filed in the usual manner...
The company I was working for is already under a lot of pressure from HSE and the local TSA. They are knowingly breaking the law with every food order that is sent out but they are allowed to continue to operate as long as they fulfill certain guidelines . . . . .
The law is not always black and white - I have never worked under conditions like this - and it has to be a joke that anyone offering employment advice thinks that it is okay for workers to be treated unprofessionally . . .0 -
OldMotherTucker wrote: »The law is not always black and white - I have never worked under conditions like this
Some cases are grey. Some cases are black and white. That's just how it goes.
People offering employment advice should advise on what the law says. Not what that individual wants the law to say.and it has to be a joke that anyone offering employment advice thinks that it is okay for workers to be treated unprofessionally . . .
There is no point advising someone to pursue a claim which would simply be thrown out by a court or employment tribunal.
Issuing hopeless claims will often lead to an order that you be required to pay the employer's legal costs. This can be thousands of pounds.0 -
jobbingmusician wrote: »
Have you actually sent your notice letter/email?
Did you fail to see this question, or are you simply ignoring it?Ex board guide. Signature now changed (if you know, you know).0 -
OldMotherTucker wrote: »The company I was working for is already under a lot of pressure from HSE and the local TSA. They are knowingly breaking the law with every food order that is sent out but they are allowed to continue to operate as long as they fulfill certain guidelines . . . . .
The law is not always black and white - I have never worked under conditions like this - and it has to be a joke that anyone offering employment advice thinks that it is okay for workers to be treated unprofessionally . . .
I'm confused. Who do you think deals with your grievance? Yes it may well be a joke, but they are entitled to run the business as they see fit as long as they meet statutory minimums, which you said they are.0 -
jobbingmusician wrote: »Did you fail to see this question, or are you simply ignoring it?
#33 - in between your posts where you were confused about who I was!0 -
steampowered wrote: »Some cases are grey. Some cases are black and white. That's just how it goes.
People offering employment advice should advise on what the law says. Not what that individual wants the law to say.
There is no point advising someone to pursue a claim which would simply be thrown out by a court or employment tribunal.
Issuing hopeless claims will often lead to an order that you be required to pay the employer's legal costs. This can be thousands of pounds.
I've never mentioned making a claim - I wanted to know why they were so insistent that I gave written notice.
They've had that - now all I want is my P60 so I can move on and start a new job asap.0 -
OldMotherTucker wrote: »They've had that - now all I want is my P60 so I can move on and start a new job asap.
P45, not P60 (P45 is for the end of employment, P60 is for the end of the tax year).
And you don't need your P45 when starting new emplyment, although if you don't have it there's a possibility that you may end up paying more tax for a bit (Which you'll get back eventually),0 -
p00hsticks wrote: »P45, not P60 (P45 is for the end of employment, P60 is for the end of the tax year).
And you don't need your P45 when starting new emplyment, although if you don't have it there's a possibility that you may end up paying more tax for a bit (Which you'll get back eventually),
Yes - that's what I meant!
I need my P60 for something else!0 -
OldMotherTucker wrote: »Yes - that's what I meant!
I need my P60 for something else!
That's not due until April (ish) 2018, so what do you need it for?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards