LEI legal expenses car accidents scam

lluzers

This is the dumb argument from the solicitors

Barrister has already advised that the issue relating to the Audatex images was secondary to the rationale of the Judge in finding against you on the day. The barrister never told the solicitors ,of his concession of no dent/damage/negligence in court .

If you don't have any dent/damage/negligence , there is no case , case dismissed no negligence ,everything else becomes secondary , but according to the solicitor the opposite is secondary.

AdrianC

lluzers wrote: »

Just vehicle damage .There was no personal injury.

So just vehicle damage - which was so slight that the photos didn't show any on your car...

debtdebt

If the Judge confirms that he could see no damage to your vehicle from the pictures before him, what do you expect your barrister to do? Magic some evidence of a dent out of nowhere? Tell the judge that he is wrong? It seems the Judge had already made his mind up based on the pictures. Either there was no damage or the damage was so minimal so as not to effect the value/state of the car due to pre existing damage.

You're a typical losing Claimant. Blaming everyone but yourself for losing the case.

AdrianC

debtdebt wrote: »

If the Judge confirms that he could see no damage to your vehicle from the pictures before him, what do you expect your barrister to do? Magic some evidence of a dent out of nowhere? Tell the judge that he is wrong?

Post those pics here, and let's see how obvious this damage is.

lluzers

My own photograph showed the damage on my computer screens , but in court these are printed on A4 , They lose clarity when printed.

There were other clearer photographs from the garage report ,these were with the the barrister , they clearly showed the dents.The garage report also had 25 other pieces of magnified damage on the car ,little spots and chips of 2 mm etc , but the garage used a 10 mm thick pen to highlight these damages , which were microscopic in actual size.This was the report , the solicitor sent to court , without my permission and without telling me.This was dumb thing to do.

Only the accident relevant car side photographs should have been submitted , giving the judge no reason to doubt the damages.In fact they should be printed in photographic quality paper , so they become clear evidence for judges.

The defendant hid all their evidence , except the evidence in their favor , so there were no doubts on their statement.

AdrianC

lluzers wrote: »

My own photograph showed the damage on my computer screens , but in court these are printed on A4 , They lose clarity when printed.

Riiight.

There were other clearer photographs from the garage report ,these were with the the barrister , they clearly showed the dents.

Strange, then, how they didn't get introduced in court.

The defendant hid all their evidence , except the evidence in their favor , so there were no doubts on their statement.

Umm, yes. That's what they do. It's your side's job to introduce the evidence in your favour.

lluzers

imgur.com/a/qZU2n


try above as I can not post links

lluzers

The judge had these pictures in front of him in court , he suffered inattention blindness.

Inattentional blindness, also known as perceptual blindness, is a psychological lack of attention that is not associated with any vision defects or deficits. It may be further defined as the event in which an individual fails to perceive an unexpected stimulus that is in plain sight.

lluzers

debtdebt wrote: »

If the Judge confirms that he could see no damage to your vehicle from the pictures before him, what do you expect your barrister to do? Magic some evidence of a dent out of nowhere? Tell the judge that he is wrong? It seems the Judge had already made his mind up based on the pictures. Either there was no damage or the damage was so minimal so as not to effect the value/state of the car due to pre existing damage.

You're a typical losing Claimant. Blaming everyone but yourself for losing the case.

I don;t think you read entire case , barrister had it all infront of him ,but came unprepared.

lluzers

added last 3 are defendants car

imgur.com/a/qZU2n