We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Creators Edition
Comments
-
Had you said you work in the NHS and know exactly what happened I may have had some respect for your views. As it is I'm still unsure of which industry you represent. I did see mention of being a Kapersky reseller so does that mean you work in PC World?
Regardless of the answer there is credible information that XP wasn't the opsys that got most infections so I'm unsure why you keep banging on about it.
Back versions of operating systems and especially old versions of IE are common or at least used to be in the days when I was an IT contractor because systems got developed and wouldn't run on later software. The systems couldn't just be junked and as often as not were so badly written that updating would take as long as rewriting and managers took the cheap option of retaining some machines just to keep them running. The NHS are certainly not alone in that.0 -
I run my own IT business which i have ran for the last 15 years, regardless the Gov. chose to stop paying MS for continued support which left their system wide open.kwikbreaks wrote: »Had you said you work in the NHS and know exactly what happened I may have had some respect for your views. As it is I'm still unsure of which industry you represent. I did see mention of being a Kapersky reseller so does that mean you work in PC World?
Regardless of the answer there is credible information that XP wasn't the opsys that got most infections so I'm unsure why you keep banging on about it.
Back versions of operating systems and especially old versions of IE are common or at least used to be in the days when I was an IT contractor because systems got developed and wouldn't run on later software. The systems couldn't just be junked and as often as not were so badly written that updating would take as long as rewriting and managers took the cheap option of retaining some machines just to keep them running. The NHS are certainly not alone in that.0 -
Ah - so an eBay seller then or maybe an IT contractor as I once was. You still have no inside info on the NHS systems though so I fail to see how you can point to XP unless you are naive enough to believe all their machines run XP.0
-
No dont sell on ebay, I offer IT support and repair PC systems. I have worked on local NHS trust systemskwikbreaks wrote: »Ah - so an eBay seller then or maybe an IT contractor as I once was. You still have no inside info on the NHS systems though so I fail to see how you can point to XP unless you are naive enough to believe all their machines run XP.0 -
Thanks. I can now put you on ignore with a perfectly clear conscience.0
-
You are obviously not held in the regard you think you are.angryparcel wrote: »yes i do, but the fact is info like this would be passed to their partners as so far nothing. I have used Kaspersky from day 1 and for the last 8 years i have been a reseller partner.
Read the report i linked too it is XP and 8 that were affected
The final nail in the coffin of your credibility is the fact that you actually linked to a Daily Mail article....:rotfl:
Good night Vienna....Drinking Rum before 10am makes you
A PIRATE
Not an Alcoholic...!0 -
The update has fixed the restore points not working which were !!!!!!ed up by the Autumn update.You know what uranium is, right? It's this thing called nuclear weapons. And other things. Like lots of things are done with uranium. Including some bad things.
Donald Trump, Press Conference, February 16, 20170 -
I've probably done 15+ installs/upgrades of the various Win 10 versions across a range of pcs and have always been a proponent.
Over a few days I'd had some updates/restarts which resulted in a broken ethernet driver.
I couldn't uninstall to let it re-install, couldn't re-install over existing because needed to uninstall, a Catch22 situation.
I also tried uninstalling the driver using Revo uninstaller.
So using WiFi, I allowed the Creators update which stalled part way through, I left it for hours, no movement.
I downloaded the .iso, created a Rufus usb and tried an in-place update from the usb.
It still stalled.
No problem, I'll do a clean install.
The clean install of Creators would hang, very similar to some of the angry threads on Microsoft.
I've now re-installed ver. 1607, which installed in minutes and everything works again.Move along, nothing to see.0 -
-
Jivesinger wrote: »Broadcom driver, by any chance?
I'd seen the reports of problems with Broadcom Bluetooth drivers, but not for Broadcom 440x 10/100 ethernet drivers.*
Microsoft advice is to not manually update, fair enough, but it was an auto update which did for me originally.:)
*edit: now found https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_10-networking/windows-10-creators-update-broke-my-lan-port/efad767b-b40a-469b-a815-9bff48dcd3c4
Mine is a Dell 6400, similar age/spec to some of those in the link below
https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_10-windows_install/problems-with-creators-update/d5117f36-b66f-4590-b2f3-a64b92445385?rtAction=1492183836572Move along, nothing to see.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455K Spending & Discounts
- 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
