Letter before claim from solicitor

Plastic18

Umkomaas...got the letters today. I might have stressed over nothing...yet. One letter was from Tim Hawker (Wright Hassall) saying he's not going to correspond with me via email since I've not confirm my details! And I have until June to pay up my debt. And the other is from ZZPS stating I have another outstanding debt! Ugh...right, will take all your good advice and wait for the proper legal claim to arrive and ignore the rest.

beamerguy

Plastic18 wrote: »

Umkomaas...got the letters today. I might have stressed over nothing...yet. One letter was from Tim Hawker (Wright Hassall) saying he's not going to correspond with me via email since I've not confirm my details! And I have until June to pay up my debt. And the other is from ZZPS stating I have another outstanding debt! Ugh...right, will take all your good advice and wait for the proper legal claim to arrive and ignore the rest.

Well done Tim Hawker, you are demonstrating how unprofessional
Wright Hassall is..

Remember the other day
D6GM2199 CEL v Mr B, Bury County Court, before DJ Osborne

"The Judge stated he was disappointed in the claimant bringing an unfounded case, and in the behaviour of Wright Hassall who were otherwise a respectable law firm"
http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2017/05/motorist-awarded-900-for-data.html

Wright Hassall wrapped by a judge .... it is the penalty paid when
you support scammers

And#OP ..... ZZPS ARE A DELUDED lot whose hobby is to
WASTE THEIR OWN TIME .... SHAME :rotfl:

Umkomaas

I don't think we've seen WH take any case as far as a court hearing. Not sure we've ever seen any 'serious' stuff from them. They just rely on the word 'Solicitors' on their letterhead to scare the sh*t out of the fragile, naive, vulnerable and easily intimidated. They hide behind Tim Hawker who is conducting a role no different to DRP, Zenith, ZZPS, and any other bottom-feeding debt collector.

Working in a sol's office doesn't mean you're any better than the rest of them!

Coupon-mad

Another poster has mentioned the name Tim Hawker on a different solicitor letter-heading. All just debt collector drivel.

Plastic18

This is the letter I received from Tim Hawker:

With reference to a recent email correspondence received from ********, the contents of which have been duly noted.
Unfortunately, we were unable to respond to this email, without confirming few security details. If you wish to correspond with us by email, please ensure you state your full details as on the top left of this letter in your email or include a copy of this letter.
However, in response to the comments raised in the email, we can confirm we are unable to consider your disputes/appeal. We are only instructed to recover the above balance and take further actions, should non-payment continue.
Our clients have reasonable cause to believe the parking event on the day breached their parking terms and conditions and that this PCN has been issued correctly. They have also confirmed to us that their initial notice was ignored, as no appeal or payment was received within the correct timeframe.
In light of the above, we will place all our actions on hold until 14th June 2017 to allow time for payment, before we proceed to commence further actions.
Please see below our payment methods we have enclosed for your convenience.

Coupon-mad

Ignore him, honestly. It's debt collector trash.

beamerguy

"Unfortunately, we were unable to respond to this email, without confirming few security details."

Yeh Yeh Yeh ....... ask Tim to confirm his security with you

These debt collectors will say and try anything >>> IGNORE

Plastic18

Ok, will ignore. See what happens after 14 th June....��

Plastic18

So, CEL, ZZPS and Wright Hassall is still sending me letters and have got another 'formal letter of claim' through the mail on 26th June. Is the advice still to ignore this letter? Many thanks.

beamerguy

Plastic18 wrote: »

So, CEL, ZZPS and Wright Hassall is still sending me letters and have got another 'formal letter of claim' through the mail on 26th June. Is the advice still to ignore this letter? Many thanks.

The words you are looking for is Letter before Claim

Still sounds like Wright Hassall pimping out their letterhead to ZZPS

Have you read this where CEL had to pay £900 to the motorist for a data breach and this was a Wright Hassall case

Not only did they lose but the judge said

"he was disappointed in the claimant bringing an unfounded case, and in the behaviour of Wright Hassall who were otherwise a respectable law firm."

Wright Hassall could go that road again especially if they act for CEL ????

Motorist awarded £900 for data protection breach by parking company
D6GM2199 CEL v Mr B, Bury County Court, before DJ Osborne

http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2017/05/motorist-awarded-900-for-data.html

You will note that there is no mention of ZZPS and that's because they have no part to play as they are simply useless debt collectors with zero power