PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Vendor moving the goal posts re fixtures & Fittings

I am part way through the process of buying a house. I have just received the property information sheet from our solicitor completed by the Vendor. Included is the fixtures and fittings list. All seemed as expected until I got to the kitchen details. The vendor has stated that the range cooker is excluded I.e. Not in the sale.

The thing is the range was explicitly mentioned in the property details when it was advertised on line and in the EA brochure. All other appliances weren't mentioned, as naturally they had decided to take them with them after sale. At the viewing, we questioned appliances with the EA and they also confirmed that the range was staying.

To my mind the vendor is now moving the goal posts as our understanding was it was part of the sale. Had I known it wasn't I would have modified my offer accordingly. I suspect they are actually keen to sell it to us as it was the only item on the fixtures list they commented on as they wrote its cost.

But I don't believe we should pay anything as we bid on a property with a range cooker included. I am quite disappointed this has happened. Any advice on how we move forwards, hopefully amicably?
«13

Comments

  • oystercatcher
    oystercatcher Posts: 2,361 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Amend your offer to value of house without range cooker and see what the vendors say.
    Decluttering, 20 mins / day Jan 2024 2/2 
  • AdrianC
    AdrianC Posts: 42,189 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    What's the value of a second-hand range? £250?

    The only paperwork that matters here is the Property Information Form that goes with the contract that's exchanged.
  • While putting the offer down did you mention it's including the things that you want from the property? In writing? Generally if the offer is not given alongside the conditions (even satisfactory surveys), then empty property possession is assumed.

    Nevertheless, you could of course go back and question them about it and certainly try to negotiate. But don't do it too hard that you end up risking the property.
    Home buying yet again!! Fingers crossed!!
    ===============================
    3 years ago ==> Completed!! PROUD homeowner from now on! :beer::beer::beer::beer:
  • But isnt. It like them saying replete with stylish bath and then excluding the bath. Surely they have simply done a uturn on that which they advertised?
  • AdrianC
    AdrianC Posts: 42,189 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    CockneyFox wrote: »
    But isnt. It like them saying replete with stylish bath and then excluding the bath. Surely they have simply done a uturn on that which they advertised?
    The "advert" does not form part of the terms of the sale. The PIF does.
  • I know nothing is legally binding unless written into the contract, but surely I have grounds to challenge as it is in effect false advertising. To replace it for something similar will cost the best part of a grand and I would not have offered what I had to purchase the house if I knew I'd have to find another grand for a range.
  • eddddy
    eddddy Posts: 18,058 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 14 May 2017 at 11:21PM
    CockneyFox wrote: »
    But isnt. It like them saying replete with stylish bath and then excluding the bath. Surely they have simply done a uturn on that which they advertised?

    Perhaps you (and others) need to calm down a little at this stage.

    Explain to the EA that your offer included the cooker, so perhaps there's an error on the F&F form. Hopefully, the EA will calmly discuss it with the seller, a new form will get completed by the seller, it will be passed to the solicitor, and everything will be fine.

    And then let your solicitor know that the form is incorrect - and say that a new one is expected, and ask them to chase the seller's solicitor for it.


    Edit to add...

    FWIW, I'm involved in a purchase at the moment where the seller has said on the F&F form that the bathroom and kitchen taps aren't included in the sale. I'm 99% sure it's a mistake which will get rectified, so I'm not getting too stressed about it.
  • G_M
    G_M Posts: 51,977 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    You don't challange this on legal grounds, you simply negotiate.

    Ways forward:

    1) Tell the EA you had assumed the range was included, get him to liaise with the seller and agree to include it, then tell your solicitor who will get the F&F form amended

    2) Do 1) above, but via solicitor. EA route might be quicker as they are less formal and make a few phone calls whereas solcitors will be writitng to each other.

    3) Meanwhile research range cookers. Get a price for a new cooker, including installation cost. If options above fail, then say "In that case I'll now have to budget £X000 for a new cooker to be installed so my purchase price is now reduced by that much."
  • I'm quite calm thanks, just after guidance from those who may have experienced similar issues. I am hopeful that it will get resolved favourably, just was keen to here if it is a common occurrence / strategy?
  • When I said "challenge" I didn't mean a legal route, just the principle of fairness and honesty. Or am I being niaive that such principle's have anything to do with home buying??

    I will pursue the EA route first and see what unfolds.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.