We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

if labour cancelled brexit would you vote them into power?

135

Comments

  • mrginge
    mrginge Posts: 4,843 Forumite
    I assume that all those voting yes in this poll are terrified of the consequences of Brexit, yet comfortable with letting labour run the wider economy.

    I suspect the actual real danger is in the latter of those two options.
  • lisyloo
    lisyloo Posts: 30,094 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    yes
    No, you're assumption is wrong (in my case anyway).
    I think the former would be worse than the latter, so not comfortable at all.


    I would not vote labour because in my constituency it would be a waste.
    We have a very good Tory MP (Michelle Donelan) and the fact that she is very good as an individual would be a factor in our case, so you certainly cannot discount people voting for an individual or local issues.
  • antrobus
    antrobus Posts: 17,386 Forumite
    zarf2007 wrote: »
    as the title says, I would be very surprised if labour didn't use this as a weapon, ...

    Prepared to be surprised.:)

    Jeremy Corbyn rules out second Brexit referendum
    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/apr/20/jeremy-corbyn-john-mcdonnell-speech-establishment-people-brexit

    If he has ruled out a second referendum, then he ain't gonna promise to cancel Article 50.
    zarf2007 wrote: »
    ..and maybe even reached out to the libdems and SNP for a coalition as they will do anything to get into power....

    Reaching out to the "SNP for a coalition" would be an almost a cast iron guarantee for the most humongous electoral disaster ever experienced by the Labour Party.

    Besides, the line is that Labour can win. And to be honest, that's the line that any government aspriring to government has to take. Any kind of 'deal' amounts to an admission that Labour can't win.
    zarf2007 wrote: »
    ..personally I think May has taken an unnecessary risk in calling this election and it could massively backfire on her, I'm praying it won't.

    It's always a risk calling an election. Calling an election when the polls are giving you a 21 point lead seems a bit less of a risk.
  • hildosaver
    hildosaver Posts: 380 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    I'm not sure even them coming out strongly and saying they will stop Brexit will do anything for them tbh. It's very likely Labour as a party are finished for this generation. What will be interesting will be to see how the likes of Lib Dem's do (not too well either I'd guess).
    I am insane and have 4 mortgages - total mortgage debt £200k. Target to zero = 10 years! (2030)
  • mayonnaise
    mayonnaise Posts: 3,690 Forumite
    mrginge wrote: »
    I assume that all those voting yes in this poll are terrified of the consequences of Brexit, yet comfortable with letting labour run the wider economy.

    I suspect the actual real danger is in the latter of those two options.

    Labour numpties running the economy for a parliamentary term would be a temporary blip.
    The adverse effects of Brexit will be felt over many, many generations.
    Don't blame me, I voted Remain.
  • A_Medium_Size_Jock
    A_Medium_Size_Jock Posts: 3,216 Forumite
    edited 21 April 2017 at 2:58PM
    no
    mayonnaise wrote: »
    Labour numpties running the economy for a parliamentary term would be a temporary blip.
    The adverse effects of Brexit will be felt over many, many generations.
    Eh?
    So Blair's foray into Iraq won't be felt for generations then?
    The result of his expansion of PFI's funding hospitals (for example) won't be felt for generations?
    Those are factual examples.

    Brexit may indeed lead to adverse effects - but it also may not.
    Whereas we can see evidence of Labour damage.


    Note if you would the lack of highlighting or the use of bold or italics, just for Mayo.
    Who must be getting so old to be unable to cope with such aberrations that I took pity.
  • lisyloo
    lisyloo Posts: 30,094 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    yes
    So Blair's foray into Iraq won't be felt for generations then?
    The result of his expansion of PFI's funding hospitals (for example) won't be felt for generations?
    Those are factual examples.


    No, it's bad, quite bad.
    However some of us see Brexit as worse than Labour running the economy.
    You might not agree with that opinion, but some of us hold that opinion.


    We vote for the LEAST BAD option as there is no perfect one.
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    I don't believe they would
    mayonnaise wrote: »
    Labour numpties running the economy for a parliamentary term would be a temporary blip.

    Why would it only be for one term?
  • antrobus
    antrobus Posts: 17,386 Forumite
    lisyloo wrote: »
    No, it's bad, quite bad.
    However some of us see Brexit as worse than Labour running the economy.
    You might not agree with that opinion, but some of us hold that opinion.

    We vote for the LEAST BAD option as there is no perfect one.

    If you vote Labour you will get Brexit and Labour running the economy. That would be the very WORST option, wouldn't it?
  • tho_2
    tho_2 Posts: 326 Forumite
    Third Anniversary
    I don't believe they would
    Aren't a lot of labours safest seats also the ones with the highest leave vote? It'd be suicide.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.