We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
"Woolaway" Construction
Options
Comments
-
Ah yes, good point. Would this normally just be a quick email to the planning department?
Then, to a certain extent, it's down to individual councils.
Emailing is too vague and impersonal and won't get the best response. Far better to make an appointment to see a planning officer, show the broad plan you'd like to propose and see what they say. It will probably cost nowadays, but not very much in the context of purchase.0 -
Thanks for the input. It's in an area where permitted development is allowed - my local council provides a planning consult for less than £100 so I'll go down that route. Thanks again.
One more question - would you consider a Woolaway construction to be a deal-breaker? Nervous FTB here. I'm confused why the Woolaway houses are listed as defective under the 1985 act but the bungalows are not...0 -
Woolaway construction can be fixed, at a price, so it may come down to the economics of the matter, maybe including whether a deal is possible with mortgage providers.
Or, like a property I know, where no one has altered the bungalow much, the location is so good the owners just put up with the inconveniences to have acres of land and great views they'd otherwise not afford.
There are no hard and fast rules.0 -
High-street mortgage lender is happy to lend us the money to buy it, and the size of plot and the views are rather stunning. The Building Survey found no evidence of any problem, so I guess we'll have plenty of time to rebuild savings to replace the external skin, should that become necessary. We're love the property but are trying to be rational and consider potential problems as dispassionately as possible...
Thanks again!0 -
Can the contents of a Woolaway building be insured?. Also, if yes/no can the building be insured?.0
-
Can the contents of a Woolaway building be insured?. Also, if yes/no can the building be insured?.
However, there's no reason why the roof of a Woolaway should be more damaged in a storm than any other bungalow, since there's nothing unusual about its construction. In an accident situation, such as a bus driven through a wall, the insurers of the vehicle would still have to pay up.
Like any other insured person, the owner of a Woolaway would be expected to keep the building secure and in a reasonably good state of repair.0 -
We have seen advertised a detached 3 bedroom Woolaway bungalow and told via email to the Estate Agent the council tax band is D and built in the 1970s. In the advert there are exterior pics and it looks like it has recently been painted with masonry paint.
Would there be less problems with 1970s Woolaway buildings than later or earlier ones? . Also, was asbestos used in roof or wall construction.0 -
All other things being equal, the younger the building the better, but of course things are never equal in terms of climate and maintenance.
I'm not aware that there were any major developments of the Woolaway design. Most of these bungalows were erected in the 60s and 70s and all those I've seen have standard roof tiles, so there would be no special need for asbestos.
People can assume asbestos may have been used in the construction of any house up to 1999, although the worst kinds of that substance were banned from building products around1985. There's nothing about reinforced concrete construction that requires asbestos to be used.
Perhaps most importantly, you should be aware that many Woolaway bungalows exist in the countryside as a result of a former need to house agricultural workers. These may have an agricultural occupancy condition (AOC) attached, which, unless it has been removed, means only those engaged in farming and forestry are entitled to reside in them. Sometimes agents are rather coy about AOCs, so before spending money on surveys, ask if the property is free of such a condition.0 -
There is still a lot of asbestos about, i.e., corrugated asbestos roofs on farm buildings, i.e.,cow sheds, stables and barns.
If a Woolaway bungalow had an adjacent garage with a corrugated asbestos roof could it be replaced by a work-team wearing breathing masks with protected clothing but would there still be asbestos dust about and a danger to occupants in the bungalow, or if the occupants attempted to remove it would a licence to do so be needed. However, perhaps it may be wiser to leave it has it is, hence lots of asbestos still about.0 -
There is still a lot of asbestos about, i.e., corrugated asbestos roofs on farm buildings, i.e.,cow sheds, stables and barns.
If a Woolaway bungalow had an adjacent garage with a corrugated asbestos roof could it be replaced by a work-team wearing breathing masks with protected clothing but would there still be asbestos dust about and a danger to occupants in the bungalow, or if the occupants attempted to remove it would a licence to do so be needed. However, perhaps it may be wiser to leave it has it is, hence lots of asbestos still about.
Old farm asbestos will not necessarily present any extra threat; certainly no more than the larger amounts found in towns and cities where the air is less clean too.
There are ways of removing asbestos roofing sheet safely and most local authorities accept it at designated recycling sites, so long as it is wrapped-up. No licence needed, as authorities don't want people doing the other thing: smashing it up and burying/dumping it!
If I were taking a roof off, I'd probably paint it both sides first with a building product called SBR, which is a surface binder. The risks of handling in open air would then be negligible. The interior underside of any asbestos left in situ could also be painted with any suitable paint product to seal it.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards