We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Work programme?
Comments
-
sadly enjoying the job is a bonus, once in a job always have the option to look for another more suitedI am responsible me, myself and I alone I am not the keeper others thoughts and words.0
-
I find it incredulous that anyone would choose to do a job they hated for 40 years. You would think that over that span they would develop the brain power and self-motivation to secure different employment they didn't hate which paid a similar rate of pay. But I know many people who have a mind set that says someone else must employ them because they cannot conceive of employing themselves. I think it's down to a lack of confidence in themselves and an absence of get up and go so they remain wage slaves. In the private sector, of course, their labour is exploited for profit.
As for the Work Programme, it's another means of terrorising the unemployed.0 -
It is a bit annoying to think of all the people working in jobs that don't interest them who also pay tax so that other people who are not interested in certain jobs can live off their taxes. The government doesn't have any money. The money that pays benefits comes from the taxes of people who are working. Some of those people who are working are not interested in their jobs but they do them to provide for their families.
What do you think those working people would think of you not applying for jobs that didn't interest you?0 -
Carrieanne wrote: »I find it incredulous that anyone would choose to do a job they hated for 40 years. You would think that over that span they would develop the brain power and self-motivation to secure different employment they didn't hate which paid a similar rate of pay. But I know many people who have a mind set that says someone else must employ them because they cannot conceive of employing themselves. I think it's down to a lack of confidence in themselves and an absence of get up and go so they remain wage slaves. In the private sector, of course, their labour is exploited for profit.
As for the Work Programme, it's another means of terrorising the unemployed.
Well if it scares them that much then there are 2 alternatives, get a job or stop claiming taxpayers money0 -
Carrieanne wrote: »As for the Work Programme, it's another means of terrorising the unemployed.
"Terrorising" is a bit strong, asking people to go on a work programme surely is part of the idea that they're on job SEEKERS and need to find employment. I can understand its hard for people due to transport and childcare and just life situations but I feel like there are people who take the p and could work.0 -
All these posts are opinions, and quite some biased opinions too. The claimant doesn't have to apply for jobs that they're not interested in as long as they meet the criteria as outlined in their jobseekers agreement. If the OP doesn't meet your expectations of the social norm, well, tough luck.0
-
Indeed tough luck, but is it also tough luck when they are informed that they will get sanctioned for not taking a job because it wasn't interesting enough?
Tough luck applies both ways, although it would seem some think it should only do so one way.0 -
If the finances of the country depended solely upon individual tax payers then it really would be broke.
I don't think it is unreasonable to expect to find a job you can get some enjoyment and fulfilment from doing.
My last job was in a supermarket and I loved every minute if it. To others that job would have been pure hell, and for those they should leave the retail jobs to the ones who can enjoy it.
As long as expectations aren't unreasonable of course!
Tom0 -
If the finances of the country depended solely upon individual tax payers then it really would be broke.
I don't think it is unreasonable to expect to find a job you can get some enjoyment and fulfilment from doing.
My last job was in a supermarket and I loved every minute if it. To others that job would have been pure hell, and for those they should leave the retail jobs to the ones who can enjoy it.
As long as expectations aren't unreasonable of course!
Tom
Did you know that you were going to enjoy the supermarket job that much before you did it?
I don't think you can tell from a job description whether you are going to like the job or not. Some of it might depend on who you work with and you can't get any indication of that from the job description.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards