We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Drifting
Comments
-
Billy_Bullocks wrote: »Well there you go, it doesn't apply. If you actually read the injunction is mentions car cruising. The taxi drivers were not a car cruise.
There is no point in arguing, but I and everyone else held up by this "convoy" would have thought that car cruising was what you are doing if your actions fit, rather than only if you are a member of a car cruising club. The injunction is intended to stop anti-social behaviour after all.I want to go back to The Olden Days, when every single thing that I can think of was better.....
(except air quality and Medical Science
)0 -
I would say the incident with the taxi drivers was a peaceful protest
google right to protest
were the taxi drivers breaking the law? they may have been braking the law by causing an obstruction but the certainly weren't car cruising0 -
There is no point in arguing, but I and everyone else held up by this "convoy" would have thought that car cruising was what you are doing if your actions fit, rather than only if you are a member of a car cruising club. The injunction is intended to stop anti-social behaviour after all.
There's no point in arguing as it wasn't a car cruise.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards