We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Right to buy process

2456

Comments

  • OP has come back for another bite at the 'wind up' cherry. S/he clearly has nothing better to do.

    Feel sorry for her Mum though.

    Social housing - death by a thousand cuts.
  • Person_one
    Person_one Posts: 28,884 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    snappyfish wrote: »
    No, because some people here like to answer questions asked backed by hate they have for a government scheme they don't agree with. That is quite pathetic.

    I do not need to prove myself for any of you. If you can't answer my questions in a polite way without steering towards your hate for RTB scheme then take your thoughts to the government and try to change the scheme.

    I'm sure if marksoton can detach himself from his little keyboard he could lead you all on a march!


    If your plan means that your mother has a more secure, better future in a house owned by the two of you than she does in a house owned and maintained by the council in a secure lifelong tenancy, then I don't understand why you are so reluctant to explain to us how that will work?

    If I knew your mother in real life I would be very very concerned about what might happen to her in the future if you were to fall into financial difficulties, or to marry and have a few children, or even to get hit by a bus or get ill yourself and need care.

    Right now your mum is safe and secure and has a guaranteed home for the rest of her life, fully maintained at no cost to her, with the council having a responsibility to make sure her accommodation is adapted to be suitable for her health and care needs. What about your plan will improve this situation for her? Not for you, for her?
  • TheGardener
    TheGardener Posts: 3,303 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 10 December 2016 at 12:16PM
    OP - Most councils retain the rights not to sell any home specifically designed to accommodate the elderly or homes that have any special adaptations for elderly or disabled tenants.
    However, if a representative from the council has been to discuss the purchase with you, it seems unlikely they would then say no.
  • marksoton
    marksoton Posts: 17,516 Forumite
    snappyfish wrote: »
    Your kinda right, but instead you have probably been drinking what marksoton drinks :beer:

    Nothing wrong with a nice Chablis.. :)
  • Cakeguts
    Cakeguts Posts: 7,627 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    OP - Most councils retain the rights not to sell any home specifically designed to accommodate the elderly or homes that have any special adaptations for elderly or disabled tenants.
    However, if a representative from the council has been to discuss the purchase with you, it seems unlikely they would then say no.

    They could still get a letter from the council saying that they don't have the right to buy on that type of property instead of a letter confirming right to buy.

    In any case if the OP had read all the threads on here about right to buy they would find out that sometimes the land around the property is not included so there nay not be any possibility of being allowed to extend.
  • marksoton wrote: »
    Nothing wrong with a nice Chablis.. :)

    Very true, but if you had seen the hospital recently and seen how much hassle drinking alcohol causes and wastes time for nurses and genuine sick people don't get seen you'd think they ban it!

    But I guess as it's allowed your participating too.

    In the same way you dislike the RTB scheme. Just different opinions and so on. ;)
  • Person_one wrote: »
    If your plan means that your mother has a more secure, better future in a house owned by the two of you than she does in a house owned and maintained by the council in a secure lifelong tenancy, then I don't understand why you are so reluctant to explain to us how that will work?

    If I knew your mother in real life I would be very very concerned about what might happen to her in the future if you were to fall into financial difficulties, or to marry and have a few children, or even to get hit by a bus or get ill yourself and need care.

    Right now your mum is safe and secure and has a guaranteed home for the rest of her life, fully maintained at no cost to her, with the council having a responsibility to make sure her accommodation is adapted to be suitable for her health and care needs. What about your plan will improve this situation for her? Not for you, for her?

    Step by step me and my mum are talking about this, since my first post many months ago in a different thread. But thanks for your concerns.

    Not something I'm jumping into lightly.
  • marksoton
    marksoton Posts: 17,516 Forumite
    snappyfish wrote: »
    Very true, but if you had seen the hospital recently and seen how much hassle drinking alcohol causes and wastes time for nurses and genuine sick people don't get seen you'd think they ban it!

    But I guess as it's allowed your participating too.

    In the same way you dislike the RTB scheme. Just different opinions and so on. ;)

    I think it's safe to say RTB and NHS provision are not comparable.
  • snappyfish wrote: »
    Very true, but if you had seen the hospital recently and seen how much hassle drinking alcohol causes and wastes time for nurses and genuine sick people don't get seen you'd think they ban it!

    But I guess as it's allowed your participating too.

    In the same way you dislike the RTB scheme. Just different opinions and so on. ;)

    I can drink alcohol and not cause any hassle to the nhs.

    I can't exercise a RTB without taking a home out of social housing
  • marksoton
    marksoton Posts: 17,516 Forumite
    I can drink alcohol and not cause any hassle to the nhs.

    I can't exercise a RTB without taking a home out of social housing

    And at the same time detriment my own mother...
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.