We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
PCN in Poole, UK CPM, DRP Ltd, Gladstones, County Court Papers received
Comments
-
Brain$torm wrote: »Are you impying that I'm not on honest poster? Not sure of the relevance / tone of your post towards me.
Sorry if I've misunderstood.
You certainly have misunderstood!
I'm suggesting (not only to you but to the general community) that an honest poster, such as yourself, would not need to worry that their thread had been identified because the claimant could not use anything in it against them.
In fact, the claimant producing a thread in court could help the defendant, as it did in my case, because pretty much everything I'd said in court, I'd also said on the forum, which gave credibility.
My concern is that when OP's back away from the forums fue to fear of exposure - this plays into the hands of the PPC's by isolating the defendant and preventing them getting the help and advice they need. It shows the PPC's are scared of the forums and, in my mind, should encourage further interaction.
If I was a PPC would I be more likely to discontinue against a defendant who had engaged with the forum intermittently or one who had engaged heavilly and clearly had a wealth of advice on their thread from knowledgeable advisors?0 -
We are all on your side, Brain$torm, except whoever provided the other side with a copy of this thread (same thing happened to Lamilad...quelle surprise...). Hmmm.PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD0 -
Brain$torm wrote: »Are you impying that I'm not on honest poster? Not sure of the relevance / tone of your post towards me.
Sorry if I've misunderstood.
Wow! :eek:Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street0 -
Why did he have a copy of the defence from this site when they claim not have received your defence ?
Was the judge asleep ?I do Contracts, all day every day.0 -
Marktheshark wrote: »Why did he have a copy of the defence from this site when they claim not have received your defence ?
Was the judge asleep ?
He had a copy of the Defence Statement, but not the evidence or witness statements supporting the defence, so he said.
I've got proof that it was sent, I expect the judge wont be too happy about them lying to him.0 -
-
Brain$torm wrote: »No need for the smart comment and emoji.
The post you quoted of mine said "sorry if I've misunderstood."
I quoted your full post, including the 'misunderstood' bit. It was a big misunderstanding - Lamilad is one of the good guys here and quite a folk hero in defeating Excel/BWL twice - and very shortly to make it a hat trick.
We're all on the same side here!Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street0 -
-
Brain$torm wrote: »Again, I repeat my apology for totally misunderstanding your post.
No apology necessary, it was a simple misunderstanding nothing more. A common problem with non verbal communication.
Let's get the focus back on winning your case. Have you been given a 'reconvene' date yet?
Also, as it was their fault that the case couldn't proceed last time - did the judge make a wasted costs order in your favour.?0 -
No apology necessary, it was a simple misunderstanding nothing more. A common problem with non verbal communication.
Let's get the focus back on winning your case. Have you been given a 'reconvene' date yet?
Also, as it was their fault that the case couldn't proceed last time - did the judge make a wasted costs order in your favour.?
The case has been moved to June.
No, the judge didn't mention any costs at all. However, I've made a revised Schedule of Costs due to the lying and time wasting.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards