Brexit will be a Titanic Success - Boris Johnson

bowlhead99

prosaver wrote: »

Your taking nonsense as usual .. your argument opions are weak
But i see you have got nothing more to defend your opinions

How much more did you want? I get the impression there is nothing more that could be said to you that would help you understand, as you don't really want to understand any position that might conflict with your own.

Even literally quoting from original source documents does not convince you; you prefer to believe the Daily Express rather than the judges or the constitutional-specialist barristers. So, there's not a lot of point trying to "defend my opinion"to you, is there? Because you have made up your mind and closed your ears.

so now you have tried a different tact trying to discredit me and make up lies about me.

I suggested you hadn't done any real research.

You only quoted someone else quoting the relevant acts, and where the part of the the documentation that you were quoting was inconveniently inconsistent with your opinion (e.g. the advice to all MPs signing the bill that the referendum was purely advisory while you believed it to be legally binding on government), you disregarded that part of the documentation. This does not strike me as high quality original research on your part.

Thanks bye.

Are you off back to the Arms or the Debate the Economy board where this sort of discussion is more at home? You would get lots of people piling in with both researched and unresearched opinions there, whereas there are relatively fewer up for such debates on a savings and investment board.

doe808

prosaver wrote: »

Your taking nonsense as usual .. your argument opions are weak
But i see you have got nothing more to defend your opinions so now you have tried a different tact trying to discredit me and make up lies about me.
Thanks bye.

Hi Prosaver, can you answer my question please (if you have any credibility left).

What do judges do?

jimjames

prosaver wrote: »

Your taking nonsense as usual .. your argument opions are weak
But i see you have got nothing more to defend your opinions so now you have tried a different tact trying to discredit me and make up lies about me.
Thanks bye.

Ha ha. I think you picked on the wrong person there. Between you and Bowlhead I think I can see exactly who is spouting nonsense and it's not Bowlhead. As usual their reply is considered and reasoned. It's a shame the same can't be said for yours.

prosaver

jimjames wrote: »

Ha ha. I think you picked on the wrong person there. Between you and Bowlhead I think I can see exactly who is spouting nonsense and it's not Bowlhead. As usual their reply is considered and reasoned. It's a shame the same can't be said for yours.

I know,

oh well, back to money saving.