We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

new tougher rules for mobile phone users

1234568

Comments

  • neilmcl wrote: »
    Existing offences for not being in control of the vehicle, careless or indeed dangerous driving.

    But only if they can prove you were not in control or the standard of your driving was below or far below that expected of a competent driver. It's not an offence to simply used the device.
  • Fat_Walt wrote: »
    If it's mounted using it wouldn't be in dispute. The question being is it still hand held?
    The Definition of a Hand-Held Mobile Phone The Regulation includes any "device, other than a two-way radio, which performs an interactive communication function by transmitting and receiving data".
    It states that a "mobile telephone or other device is to be treated as hand-held if it is, or must be, held at some point during the course of making or receiving a call or performing any other interactive communication function". "interactive communication function" includes:
    1. sending or receiving oral or written messages;
    2. sending or receiving facsimile documents;
    3. sending or receiving still or moving images; and
    4. providing access to the internet
    There are two exemptions:
    • 2-way "press to talk" radios, such as used by the emergency services and taxi drivers
    • Using a hand-held phone for a genuine emergency call to 999 or 112 if it would be unsafe for the driver to stop.




    Simply by interacting with a mobile device in its holder whilst driving or with the engine running but stationary you commit an offence.
  • The Definition of a Hand-Held Mobile Phone The Regulation includes any "device, other than a two-way radio, which performs an interactive communication function by transmitting and receiving data".
    It states that a "mobile telephone or other device is to be treated as hand-held if it is, or must be, held at some point during the course of making or receiving a call or performing any other interactive communication function". "interactive communication function" includes:
    1. sending or receiving oral or written messages;
    2. sending or receiving facsimile documents;
    3. sending or receiving still or moving images; and
    4. providing access to the internet
    There are two exemptions:
    • 2-way "press to talk" radios, such as used by the emergency services and taxi drivers
    • Using a hand-held phone for a genuine emergency call to 999 or 112 if it would be unsafe for the driver to stop.




    Simply by interacting with a mobile device in its holder whilst driving or with the engine running but stationary you commit an offence.

    If it's within a holder it's no longer handheld.
  • tony6403
    tony6403 Posts: 1,257 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    People will still use phones - police enforcement just doesn't happen.


    I see about 1 in 12 drivers on their phones ( not handsfree ) when driving my motorbike EVERY SINGLE DAY and I only do 11 miles a day.


    Always fun to slow down, make an obvious check off their number plates and wait for them to register I'm checking their number plates then the phone goes away straight away. I am in a high viz police type jacket ( actually a builders jacket ), once glance and the phone goes away.


    Drivers know there are no police about so don't care.

    Perhaps a new offence should be created ; that of being distracted whilst counting mobile phone use by other drivers.
    Forgotten but not gone.
  • arcon5
    arcon5 Posts: 14,099 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Tbh I wouldn't be taking any advice on road safety given by a biker too seriously. They seem to be a law upon them self. Natural selection and all that.
  • Mercdriver
    Mercdriver Posts: 3,898 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    arcon5 wrote: »
    Tbh I wouldn't be taking any advice on road safety given by a biker too seriously. They seem to be a law upon them self. Natural selection and all that.

    That's quite a bold generalisation. Care to back it up with actual facts rather than hyperbole?
  • The Definition of a Hand-Held Mobile Phone The Regulation includes any "device, other than a two-way radio, which performs an interactive communication function by transmitting and receiving data".
    It states that a "mobile telephone or other device is to be treated as hand-held if it is, or must be, held at some point during the course of making or receiving a call or performing any other interactive communication function". "interactive communication function" includes:
    You posted the information above but it appears that you didn't actually read what you were posting as you missed the most important part of it:
    if it is, or must be, held at some point during the course of making or receiving a call or performing
    If the phone is mounted in a hands free holder then irrespective of having to touch the screen to type a text, you are not in breach of the regulations concerned.

    Yes, you may well be breaking other laws but not the one you quoted.
  • Sicard
    Sicard Posts: 890 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 500 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    neilmcl wrote: »
    I love it when posters come along and see here are the facts then go ahead and plagiarise, word for word, something they've just googled and read from a newspaper from 2014 - http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/490393/Mobile-phone-use-the-biggest-cause-of-road-fatalities


    I love it when hillbilly's come along and diss because they've gone through their miserable sad lives unable to contribute anything positive to society...

    14wzr6p.jpg
    You know what uranium is, right? It's this thing called nuclear weapons. And other things. Like lots of things are done with uranium. Including some bad things.
    Donald Trump, Press Conference, February 16, 2017

  • w50nky
    w50nky Posts: 418 Forumite
    Perhaps in the future phone manufacturers will use the phones GPS facility to inhibit the phones use whilst the phone is traveling over say 10MPH. Relative to the Country's road map. My old phone would be worth a fortune then!
    If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you! :dance:
  • unforeseen
    unforeseen Posts: 7,413 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    w50nky wrote: »
    Perhaps in the future phone manufacturers will use the phones GPS facility to inhibit the phones use whilst the phone is traveling over say 10MPH. Relative to the Country's road map. My old phone would be worth a fortune then!

    That would deny passengers the use of their phones and also the legitimate afforded to the driver.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.