UKPC 2nd letter stage

hineyb

hi

was looking at wrong fine/invoice (im learning)

is this ok to put these photos?? with the arrow pointing to the how far away the sign is ?

hineyb

is this enough text to go with it? or do i need to add more??

Coupon-mad

I'd go as far as to say that NO SIGNS are at the back of this building at all (there is what looks like something white - a sign, who knows? - in the far distance beside another building but not here at this place, beside THESE double yellows).

hineyb

Ok so i sent that one

im now on to the next one which if u remember in the earlier post i said that they asked for the permit which i sent them and they rejected.. silly asking for the permit really..

should i include in my popla letter saying that they asked for permit and when sent they still continued to try and fine me??? or shall i just ammend the latest letter we did?

Coupon-mad

hineyb wrote: »

Ok so i sent that one

im now on to the next one which if u remember in the earlier post i said that they asked for the permit which i sent them and they rejected.. silly asking for the permit really..

should i include in my popla letter saying that they asked for permit and when sent they still continued to try and fine me??? or shall i just ammend the latest letter we did?

I would amend the POPLA appeal to suit, proof reading the entire thing and removing the stuff about double yellows if that one was not about that.

You can see a decent 'permit holder' POPLA appeal example posted by IanMSpencer in the penultimate page of POPLA Decisions (near the other template POPLA appeal wording suggestions from me). You may like to use some of his wording about permits and why there is no 'legitimate interest' arising from the landowner's intentions (which are obviously aimed solely at stopping random people using the car park). Fining an authorised/permitted person even when the PPC knows they had a permit is unconscionable in the extreme, clearly there to punish, which makes the charge unenforceable.

hineyb

Ok Thanks coup...

i have just checked my first POPLA appeal and its on the second stage now.. nerves kicking in!

hineyb

DecisionSuccessful
Assessor NameLinda McMillan
Assessor summary of operator case
Operator has submitted no evidence.

Assessor summary of your case
The appellant’s raises several grounds for appeal including signage, landowner authority and PoFA2012.

Assessor supporting rational for decision
By issuing the appellant with a Parking Charge Notice (PCN), the operator has implied that the appellant has not complied with the terms and conditions of the car park in question. It is the duty of the operator to provide evidence to POPLA of the terms and conditions that the appellant did not comply with. The operator has not provided any evidence to POPLA. As the operator has not provided a response to the appeal, it has not demonstrated that the PCN is valid. Accordingly, I must allow this appeal.


ONE DOWN THREE TO GO.. WOOOOO