We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Dignity and Respect at work

13567

Comments

  • wheezy57
    wheezy57 Posts: 1,337 Forumite
    I should have known better than to air this on this forum. It was a general 'what if' scenario.
  • sangie595
    sangie595 Posts: 6,092 Forumite
    wheezy57 wrote: »
    I should have known better than to air this on this forum. It was a general 'what if' scenario.

    To which you have had the best possible answers given your (continuing) lack of any information at all. Do not blame the forum or other posters for your own shortcomings. If you want good answers you have to ask good questions.

    And I repeat - I will lay bets that there is a conditional word next to that "deadline" and that there is no deadline at all. How do I know this? Because I have never seen a grievance policy that wasn't written in that way.
  • robatwork
    robatwork Posts: 7,306 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    wheezy57 wrote: »

    The deadline has passed by 2/52. For the non cryptic code readers that means two weeks.

    I have never seen weeks referred to as 6-7/52 as in your OP and also had to guess its meaning.

    Are you perhaps in medicine? Do you expect everyone else to be familiar with your jargon?
  • sangie595
    sangie595 Posts: 6,092 Forumite
    robatwork wrote: »
    I have never seen weeks referred to as 6-7/52 as in your OP and also had to guess its meaning.

    Are you perhaps in medicine? Do you expect everyone else to be familiar with your jargon?

    Perhaps you meant "on" and not "in"?
  • Tiddlywinks
    Tiddlywinks Posts: 5,777 Forumite
    I've been Money Tipped!
    sangie595 wrote: »
    Perhaps you meant "on" and not "in"?

    Unnecessary and spiteful comment.
    :hello:
  • sangie595
    sangie595 Posts: 6,092 Forumite
    Unnecessary and spiteful comment.
    Not in the slightest bit spiteful. The OP has asked an incomprehensible question and expected answers, and then become belligerent and nasty when they didn't get the answers they wanted. I do wonder sometimes whether it would be helpful to have a two part new thread option - "what is your question" and "what are the answers you want". That way we could save time trying to help people who don't want advice.
  • sangie595 wrote: »
    Not in the slightest bit spiteful. The OP has asked an incomprehensible question and expected answers, and then become belligerent and nasty when they didn't get the answers they wanted. I do wonder sometimes whether it would be helpful to have a two part new thread option - "what is your question" and "what are the answers you want". That way we could save time trying to help people who don't want advice.

    So you thought you'd have a dig about their mental health? Because that's what the suggestion that someone is "on medicine", "needs to take their meds" etc really means isn't it?

    I don't think you meant it in a nasty way, but your comment (joke?) was pretty ignorant.
  • sangie595
    sangie595 Posts: 6,092 Forumite
    So you thought you'd have a dig about their mental health? Because that's what the suggestion that someone is "on medicine", "needs to take their meds" etc really means isn't it?

    I don't think you meant it in a nasty way, but your comment (joke?) was pretty ignorant.
    For your information, how you read it is not my fault, but that is not what I meant at all. I am on medication and not for mental health issues at all. I have no reason to make the connection that you made, and didn't make that connection. I meant that the OP had demonstrated a nasty side to them, and showed no respect towards anyone here - which is perverse considering their complaint! So the comment was about there being "something wrong with them" rather than any comment or suggestion of any other kind.
  • Alice_Walker
    Alice_Walker Posts: 574 Forumite
    sangie595 wrote: »
    For your information, how you read it is not my fault, but that is not what I meant at all. I am on medication and not for mental health issues at all. I have no reason to make the connection that you made, and didn't make that connection. I meant that the OP had demonstrated a nasty side to them, and showed no respect towards anyone here - which is perverse considering their complaint! So the comment was about there being "something wrong with them" rather than any comment or suggestion of any other kind.

    What other kind of medication would be related to wheezy having a nasty side to them, being belligerent, making incomprehensible posts? It's quite clear that your post was meant in a derogatory sense, and that references to people "taking their medication" in such a context relate to mental health.

    You're clearly an intelligent person, trying to brush it off by playing dumb does not suit. You made an error of judgment, better to learn from it than dig a large hole for yourself.
  • missbiggles1
    missbiggles1 Posts: 17,481 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Unnecessary and spiteful comment.

    I expect many of us thought the same.:D
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.