We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

cyclists turned right when i overtook

Options
1474850525368

Comments

  • ]I attempted to overtake 2 cyclists, there is absolutely nothing wrong with doing this and so far no one on this thread has given any explanation as to why this could possibly be wrong.
    Originally posted by kraken776
    Quite simply, because you crashed into one of them.

    I have noticed that you have completely ignored post #470 where I made many points and questions.

    Why is this?

    Is it because you dont have a single answer to any of the points i have made and cannot answer any of the questions i have asked?

    I also notice that you have made a statement which has absolutely nothing to do with my last post, a statement which you have made many times before and which i have given an answer to many times before,

    why have you completely ignored the answer i have given many times?
    why have you failed to learn from the fact that i have called you out for this behavior many times before, surely by now any intelligent person would have realized that he is going to be called out for it every single time?
  • Quite simply, because you crashed into one of them.
    bigadaj wrote: »
    There have been a lot of hypotheticals in the OPs various versions.

    If you are overtaking you really need to be clear of that lane, which wasn't the case here whether it's a bike or car shouldn't make much difference.

    A bike or motorbike may vary their position in that lane, but in this case as is common the OP appears to have squeezed past in the same lane.

    I have noticed that you have repeated the sentence which is in bold multiple times.

    If you look at my OP you will notice that i have said

    "I moved all the way over into the opposite lane for the overtake".

    So no, you are wrong, everything you have said based on this is completely invalid.
  • bigadaj wrote: »
    s.It's appears he tried to 'nip past' and got can't out by a narrowing road and road furniture which led to the collision or not..

    Nope

    I attempted my overtake a very very long time before i reached the chicane.
    the google map link i previously provided makes this clear.
  • Joe_Horner
    Joe_Horner Posts: 4,895 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary Combo Breaker
    Go. Away. Please.
  • Sicard
    Sicard Posts: 865 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 500 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Yes, do as your mum tells you and do your homework and clear up your room.
    You know what uranium is, right? It's this thing called nuclear weapons. And other things. Like lots of things are done with uranium. Including some bad things.
    Donald Trump, Press Conference, February 16, 2017

  • buglawton
    buglawton Posts: 9,246 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Many motorists have a bit of an instinct about not overtaking near junctions, mainly because you cannot predict if some idiot will lurch out of that junction in the middle of your manoeuvre.

    Anyway I thought I'd see what Highway Code says:
    "Do not overtake... approaching or at a road junction on either side of the road"
    http://www.highwaycode.info/rule/167

    So even if cyclist was wrong not to check his rear view and not signal, a court or insurer may look dimly at the OPs action. If cyclist was wearing a helmet cam it will clearly show if he failed to check rear view due to lack of head movement. Wonder what cyclists will do if challenged on that.

    Last time I had an altercation overtaking a cyclist was that at the moment I started my overtaking manoeuvre, an impatient motorist behind me (who was aware we were both following a cyclist) decided to overtake me. Ever since then I've decided it's a good habit to signal before overtaking a cyclist.
  • Joe_Horner
    Joe_Horner Posts: 4,895 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary Combo Breaker
    buglawton wrote: »
    Many motorists have a bit of an instinct about not overtaking near junctions


    Ahh, the old "Don't want to be responsible for squashing someone because insurance doesn't cover the guilt" instinct. Sadly seems to be missing in a lot of people nowadays.
  • bigadaj
    bigadaj Posts: 11,531 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    kraken776 wrote: »
    Nope

    I attempted my overtake a very very long time before i reached the chicane.
    the google map link i previously provided makes this clear.

    Surely you would have done, had you overtaken, which of course you didn't because you claim the incident didn't happen and this is a theoretical case of course.
  • Mercdriver
    Mercdriver Posts: 3,898 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    kraken776 wrote: »
    Nope

    I attempted my overtake a very very long time before i reached the chicane.
    the google map link i previously provided makes this clear.

    I'm confused. I thought the incident didn't happen?????
  • ElefantEd
    ElefantEd Posts: 1,224 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I see Schroedinger's Cyclist has popped up again - has the OP got Quantum Insurance to cover both eventualities?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.