We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
cyclists turned right when i overtook
Options
Comments
-
Aylesbury_Duck wrote: »Everything beyond the boundary of Kraken's car seems to be dismissed as "IRRELIVENT". He is totally incapable of reading anything into the wider context of the environment he's in.
Driveways and concealed entrances - irrelevant.
Speed humps - irrelevant.
Width restriction - irrelevant.
Second cyclist - irrelevant.
Cycle lane - irrelevant.
Cycle lane gate - irrelevant.
Just what is relevant Kraken? Let me guess. Just the cyclist's behaviour? Of course...
Maybe Crackhead would be a more appropriate name.0 -
Nobbie1967 wrote: »It's funny, but the more you write, the more it is clear that you do not understand what constitutes safe driving behaviour. I think it's pretty likely that most of the posters on this thread would have avoided the incident with the cyclist as they can see that there are many hazards that would make an overtake unsafe. The fact that you still can't see this merely proves a lack of insight on your part. No amount of bluster and name calling will change that, but it's funny watching you try:rotfl:
Carry on:T
Im a bit confused about why you have used the :rotfl: and :T symbols after this and many other posts of embarrassing yourself0 -
qwert_yuiop wrote: »Yoicks. Twenty pages later.
Just count yourself very lucky you didn't kill the bloke. Leave it at that.
Please.
This is the second time this comment has been made
so ill just make something very clear
The only person is is lucky is the cyclist
He could have been killed because he didn't look or signal.
The only consequence for me would have been damage to my car which i would have claimed from the dead mans estate.0 -
Aylesbury_Duck wrote: »Everything beyond the boundary of Kraken's car seems to be dismissed as "IRRELIVENT". He is totally incapable of reading anything into the wider context of the environment he's in.
Driveways and concealed entrances - irrelevant.
Speed humps - irrelevant.
Width restriction - irrelevant.
Second cyclist - irrelevant.
Cycle lane - irrelevant.
Cycle lane gate - irrelevant.
Just what is relevant Kraken? Let me guess. Just the cyclist's behaviour? Of course...
Would you please explain how each ot these are relevant and make a argument that is strong enough to show that i was at least driving carelessly.
Oh
if you result to insults, selectively ignoring information, making up facts, exaggerating or making clearly irrational judgments i am just going to humiliate you (again) by pointing it out.0 -
Kraken, I refer you to the majority of 396 posts over the last 20 pages. Everything you need to prove your careless driving can be found there. It's been quite conclusive. You've not accepted anything anyone has said for 396 posts, so I doubt you'd be willing to learn anything from yet another post conclusively pointing out your shoddy driving.
Please continue to humiliate me, it hurts a lot. :rotfl:0 -
if you result to insults, selectively ignoring information, making up facts, exaggerating or making clearly irrational judgments i am just going to humiliate you (again) by pointing it out.
Insults? Ignoring points? Exaggerating?
Ever heard the phrase 'Pot calling the kettle black', chum?0 -
This is the second time this comment has been made
so ill just make something very clear
The only person is is lucky is the cyclist
He could have been killed because he didn't look or signal.
The only consequence for me would have been damage to my car which i would have claimed from the dead mans estate.
Can you claim when you're in prison?0 -
BeenThroughItAll wrote: »Insults? Ignoring points? Exaggerating?
Ever heard the phrase 'Pot calling the kettle black', chum?
At least he's stayed clear of regular oil changes and BMWs.0 -
Silver-Surfer wrote: »At least he's stayed clear of regular oil changes and BMWs.
True. Small mercies!0 -
Silver-Surfer wrote: »At least he's stayed clear of regular oil changes and BMWs.
irrelevant
Bollox, I think it's contagious!0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards