WASPI Campaign .... State Pensions
Options
Comments
-
Malthusian wrote: »WASPI2 then, for those who aren't following. Or maybe we should distinguish them by their asks and call them "WASPI60" and "WASPI??". Or go a la Coke with "New WASPI" and "WASPI Classic".
Certainly looking more and more like they are going to have to settle for "WASPI Zero" rather than "WASPI Max"...I work for a financial services intermediary specialising in the at-retirement market. I am not a financial adviser, and any comments represent my opinion only and should not be construed as advice or a recommendation0 -
so that a couple could retire together. Men were on average 5 years older than their wives. To large extent this is still true.
It's never been true that women are on average five years younger than their husbands, let alone in single gender marriages where both get to receive the state pension earlier. The real difference has typically been about two years and about two years before state pension age is also when people, make and female, tend to retire.My aunt who is 10 years older than me did that, and never worked again.0 -
Men were on average 5 years older than their wives. To large extent this is still true.
The issue is of course that this isn't true and hasn't been at any point in the 20th century.
http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/34801/1/PT120AgeDifference.pdfI work for a financial services intermediary specialising in the at-retirement market. I am not a financial adviser, and any comments represent my opinion only and should not be construed as advice or a recommendation0 -
Interesting that by 2001 only 65% of marriages had an older husband. Also interesting that only a quarter of marriages between 1921 and 2001 had an age difference of 2-3 years.0
-
THE AIM OF THE CAMPAIGN IS: TO ACHIEVE FAIR TRANSITIONAL STATE PENSION ARRANGEMENTS FOR WOMEN BORN IN THE 1950S (BORN ON OR AFTER 6TH APRIL 1951)
This translates into a 'bridging' pension to cover the gap from age 60 until State Pension Age - not means-tested and with compensation for losses for those women who have already reached their SPA. There are no specific age groups within the period mentioned above that are favoured above others.
We do not ask for the pension age to revert back to age 60
” But they do say this
“ WASPI agrees with equalisation
I think we all know which decade the WASPI ringleaders were born in!0 -
"We do not ask for the pension age to revert back to age 60"
My problem is no longer with their campaign. It's with "revert back" on what it is, presumably, a public statement.:rotfl:
Tut Tut.
Mufi (b. 1953)0 -
Our local rag is running the action day story. One of the organisers stating that all of a sudden her pension date has moved by six years - living under a rock for the past 21 years obviously.0
-
Our local rag is running the action day story. One of the organisers stating that all of a sudden her pension date has moved by six years - living under a rock for the past 21 years obviously.
Yes indeed.
"All of a sudden"
Just like the 'stories' recounted in the debates.
Shame on those duplicitous some.
I would be ashamed to ally myself with them & their cause.0 -
Link:
http://www.waspi.co.uk/action
Apparently, according to the Derby Telegraph, they have Jeremy Corbyn's backing.
:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:0 -
Women born in the 1950s have said the changes mean they will lose up to £40,000 because they are unable to retire as early as they anticipated.The campaign group Women Against State Pension Inequality (WASPI), which is holding demonstrations across Scotland, said retirement plans had been shattered with devastating consequences.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 343.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 250.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 449.7K Spending & Discounts
- 235.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 608.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 173.1K Life & Family
- 248K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 15.9K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards