Adult sharing inappropriate content

Guest101

settlerofcatan wrote: »

To be honest I downplayed the situation to my social worker friend. There were bits I left out. She still recommended escalating it. It took me two days to actually report it because I was fearful of the fallout and the affect on my sons.

Not 100% sure what the problem with using "pre-teen" is. Didn't want to give away too many identifying factors.

Two ways to look at that:


1: How many 12 year olds are there?


2: How many 'pre-teens' are in a facebook group with their dad, who's sharing 'HC !!!!!!'?


I don't think the age was the identifying criteria in this case.....

settlerofcatan

Spinkz wrote: »

Because you are the notorious 1 :eek:

MSE PPR you, you come back. They PPR you again, you come back. Its always the same style, on the same board and the same style of content. This thread is nothing that should be posted on here but it will cause controversy and that is the aim. I really think MSE need to take legal action to stop you. Going by your accounts, you've been doing this for over 2 years on here

I'm not sure who you think I am, but I have never been banned or posted anything on this subject before.

ThatIsLUSH

Spinkz wrote: »

Because you are the notorious 1 :eek:

MSE PPR you, you come back. They PPR you again, you come back. Its always the same style, on the same board and the same style of content. This thread is nothing that should be posted on here but it will cause controversy and that is the aim. I really think MSE need to take legal action to stop you. Going by your accounts, you've been doing this for over 2 years on here

That's a pretty extreme accusation to make. how can you possibly tell if this is someone who has been banned in the past????


Also, what part of the OP's post was inflammatory?? it seems like they just want genuine advice rather that the huge about of victim blaming that seems to be happening.

settlerofcatan

Spinkz wrote: »

I know who you are, you know i know who you are and we both know you are very recently PPR'd. MSE are on to you now because your trolling is that severe. You've been doing this on here for over 2 years, you've become predictable and i'm not the only person who can see it

Honestly, you're getting me mixed up with somebody else.

Guest101

settlerofcatan wrote: »

Honestly, you're getting me mixed up with somebody else.

The lady doth protest too much, methinks

missbiggles1

I don't know or care whether the OP is genuine or not. What I find interesting is the attitudes of regular posters that her thread has dragged out into the open.

Guest101

missbiggles1 wrote: »

I don't know or care whether the OP is genuine or not. What I find interesting is the attitudes of regular posters that her thread has dragged out into the open.

Since you don't bother to read what people actually say, can I suggest adding the word perceived before 'attitudes'

ThatIsLUSH

Guest101 wrote: »

Since you don't bother to read what people actually say, can I suggest adding the word perceived before 'attitudes'

And there was me thinking that you were all for misinterpreting people and not believing what they post as real (it was you that claimed that the OP was exaggerating wasn't it??). If that is the case then adding the word "perceived" would change nothing as everything that people posts can be changed at your whim to reflect the reality that you see.

mumps

OP do you know who looked at this from a Police point of view. I have literally worked in a Police Station where a murderer came in to surrender and was turned away. No joking. Fortunately there was an officer passing through the front office who did take it seriously. There are lazy police officers who will try to wriggle out of dealing with things.

There are specialist departments who look at this sort of thing, if a specialist hasn't looked at it I would suggest you find out who is responsible in your force and refer it to them. If a specialist department has looked at it I am surprised they aren't doing anything to be honest with you, what you describe is worrying and does need looking at properly.

AnnieO1234

I would be pressing the police to act on this personally. Could the conversation and attached articles be considered to be "extreme pornography" in line with Section 63 of the Criminal Justice & Immigration Act 2008? Further info here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_63_of_the_Criminal_Justice_and_Immigration_Act_2008

You also say that the father was encouraging the 15 year old to have sex, I believe this would come under the purview of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 - possibly section 10 (Causing or inciting a child to engage in sexual activity) or section 12 - (Causing a child to watch a sexual act). This wiki offers a good breakdown of the various sections:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_offences_in_the_United_Kingdom

I would be beyond livid and wouldn't be allowing any contact between child and father without supervision. What the father has done is absolutely not okay, the child is 12.

xxx