Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Outlook If The UK Remains In The EU, But Other Countries Leave?

124

Comments

  • Masomnia
    Masomnia Posts: 19,506 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Generali wrote: »
    Most financially viable countries are part of larger trading compacts. The USA is, Australia is.

    Lots of people vote for socialism but that's because they're stupid not because it's good for them.

    If we were talking about a trading bloc there wouldn't even be a referendum because no one would have a problem (apart from some fringe loonies).

    The EU can pass laws, and if they pass laws that conflict with UK law then the EU law takes precedence. The US and Aus are not involved in any such arrangement; there's no comparison.
    “I could see that, if not actually disgruntled, he was far from being gruntled.” - P.G. Wodehouse
  • Generali
    Generali Posts: 36,411 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Masomnia wrote: »
    If we were talking about a trading bloc there wouldn't even be a referendum because no one would have a problem (apart from some fringe loonies).

    The EU can pass laws, and if they pass laws that conflict with UK law then the EU law takes precedence. The US and Aus are not involved in any such arrangement; there's no comparison.

    Not true. The WTO Rules trump national laws and both Australia and the USA are members of the WTO.
  • Generali wrote: »
    Sure.

    Will Turkey join the EU at some point between one second from now and the end of time? Probably.

    we are making baby steps we got a probably ! .... Okay ... Now lets try the 2nd baby step... WE ARE MAKING PROGRESS ... When is your "probably" most likely to occur ?

    A) 1 second
    B) 12 months
    C) 3 years
    D) a decade
    E 10-20 years
    F) end of time
  • Generali
    Generali Posts: 36,411 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    we are making baby steps we got a probably ! .... Okay ... Now lets try the 2nd baby step... WE ARE MAKING PROGRESS ... When is your "probably" most likely to occur ?

    A) 1 second
    B) 12 months
    C) 3 years
    D) a decade
    E 10-20 years
    F) end of time

    Yes. One of those or perhaps none.

    I don't know whether you have me confused with another poster but you should realise that I'm not a fortune teller.
  • No confusion.... Thank you :)
  • Generali
    Generali Posts: 36,411 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    No confusion.... Thank you :)

    Any time old thing.
  • CLAPTON
    CLAPTON Posts: 41,865 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Generali wrote: »
    Not true. The WTO Rules trump national laws and both Australia and the USA are members of the WTO.

    But you don't actually believe there is any real comparison between WTO rules and the EU rules.

    Your worship of the Eu is affecting your judgement : is that guilt because you rejected her and throw lager in her face?
  • vivatifosi
    vivatifosi Posts: 18,746 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Mortgage-free Glee! PPI Party Pooper
    Here's what I see happening. Countries like Austria will stay in the EU, but join the more eurosceptic nations in opposing closer union. I don't think closer union can now happen, there's too much sentiment against it

    However this will store up problems for the Eurozone... If you want to be more of a trading bloc (which, whichever way you look at it makes sense), then staying in is fine, but do they want to stay in the euro and bankroll the south? Equally imo, a divided European Union will find it even harder to deal with the thorny issue of immigration.

    In terms of Turkey, I can foresee a special nation status coming into play. It is too big to join and will cause imbalance inside. However it has no real natural partners, being distrusted by its other neighbours.. the Arab world isn't keen and neither is Russia. Therefore having a favourable bilateral trade agreement without full free movement would make sense and help the country further it's development.
    Please stay safe in the sun and learn the A-E of melanoma: A = asymmetry, B = irregular borders, C= different colours, D= diameter, larger than 6mm, E = evolving, is your mole changing? Most moles are not cancerous, any doubts, please check next time you visit your GP.
  • kabayiri
    kabayiri Posts: 22,740 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts
    Will it be policy which drives further EU expansion, or the need to respond to events?

    Did the decision of Chancellor Merkel, to take in 1m or so Syrian refugees, drive future EU policy more than any longer term plan?

    The situation regards Turkey could change and evolve very quickly in the next few years. I'm not sure anyone can come up with a clear plan in the face of some pretty big geopolitical challenges.
  • CLAPTON
    CLAPTON Posts: 41,865 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    vivatifosi wrote: »
    Here's what I see happening. Countries like Austria will stay in the EU, but join the more eurosceptic nations in opposing closer union. I don't think closer union can now happen, there's too much sentiment against it

    However this will store up problems for the Eurozone... If you want to be more of a trading bloc (which, whichever way you look at it makes sense), then staying in is fine, but do they want to stay in the euro and bankroll the south? Equally imo, a divided European Union will find it even harder to deal with the thorny issue of immigration.

    In terms of Turkey, I can foresee a special nation status coming into play. It is too big to join and will cause imbalance inside. However it has no real natural partners, being distrusted by its other neighbours.. the Arab world isn't keen and neither is Russia. Therefore having a favourable bilateral trade agreement without full free movement would make sense and help the country further it's development.

    it would seem to me that the whole world would be a better place if there was more free trade unencumbered by the issue of movement of people.

    If the EU hadn't spent 50 years prevented developing countries trading then who knows, the countries of Africa and maybe the middle east would be better places.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.