We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Car declared SORN but....

Options
1567911

Comments

  • maddogb
    maddogb Posts: 473 Forumite
    edited 28 March 2016 at 9:18PM
    Joe_Horner wrote: »
    Well, in that case I apologise for misunderstanding your first post quoted above, where you (not your insurers) said that SS's post "wasn't definite".

    Crafty misquote without the question mark, I asked not I "said" so now you owe me another apology.
    And I would of thanked you for the knowledge if you hadn't made me wish I had read the whole road traffic act by not reading my posts.
  • maddogb
    maddogb Posts: 473 Forumite
    So they may cancel for being unroadworthy were is the cancellation for no mot?

    Not there is it?:D

    Yes, it is.
  • maddogb wrote: »
    Yes, it is.

    Well not in the paragraph you posted, maybe it's on another page.

    Next you'll be claiming your insurance is void for a crack in the swept area of the windscreen. Won't make your vehicle unroadworthy but it ain't complying to regulations.
  • maddogb
    maddogb Posts: 473 Forumite
    Next you'll be claiming your insurance is void for a crack in the swept area of the windscreen. Won't make your vehicle unroadworthy but it ain't complying to regulations.

    Wow the twin gifts of remote viewing of strangers policies and a "prophet" as well.

    Or maybe just delusional and argumentative (and bad at it) but let's face it if you actually "knew" anything you would't have agreed with such wildly inaccurate posts in my esure thread.
  • robbies_gal
    robbies_gal Posts: 7,895 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    shop em why should everyone else have to pay their tax and mot and he doesnt
    What goes around-comes around
  • maddogb wrote: »
    Wow the twin gifts of remote viewing of strangers policies and a "prophet" as well.

    Or maybe just delusional and argumentative (and bad at it) but let's face it if you actually "knew" anything you would't have agreed with such wildly inaccurate posts in my esure thread.

    You posted it, sadly it doesn't back up your claim and confirms what others said beforehand. It's an unroadworthy vehicle that causes insurance to be voided not the lack of an mot. You haven't proved otherwise and cannot as you are trying to pass off an old wives tale as fact.

    I'll stand by the fact the lack of an mot will not void your policy. I'll leave you to your ignorance as you refuse to be educated.
  • maddogb
    maddogb Posts: 473 Forumite
    You posted it, sadly it doesn't back up your claim and confirms what others said beforehand. It's an unroadworthy vehicle that causes insurance to be voided not the lack of an mot. You haven't proved otherwise and cannot as you are trying to pass off an old wives tale as fact.

    I'll stand by the fact the lack of an mot will not void your policy. I'll leave you to your ignorance as you refuse to be educated.

    Again no claims just telling you facts, here's another, your reading skills are so poor I concede any hope, you have the ability to understand anything that's has been said in this thread.
  • Joe_Horner
    Joe_Horner Posts: 4,895 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary Combo Breaker
    You posted it, sadly it doesn't back up your claim and confirms what others said beforehand. It's an unroadworthy vehicle that causes insurance to be voided not the lack of an mot. You haven't proved otherwise and cannot as you are trying to pass off an old wives tale as fact.

    I'll stand by the fact the lack of an mot will not void your policy. I'll leave you to your ignorance as you refuse to be educated.


    It's actually kind of irrelevant what's in his policy anyway because even having the car "properly" unroadworthy- from actual faults rather than just a lack of MOT - won't void the legally required (ie: 3rd party cover) part of the policy. And nothing in his policy wording can alter that ;)
  • Joe_Horner wrote: »
    It's actually kind of irrelevant what's in his policy anyway because even having the car unroadworthy won't void the legally required (ie: 3rd party cover) part of the policy. And nothing in his policy wording can alter that ;)

    That's true.

    But then when I said that on page one he questioned it then built up a straw man arguement.
  • maddogb
    maddogb Posts: 473 Forumite
    That's true.

    But then when I said that on page one he questioned it then built up a straw man arguement.

    Haha so there's the key, I dared to ask a question, sad.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.