We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Please help me, I'm desperate
Comments
-
Oh god, don't make me panic haha!!0
-
I'm pleased for you and hope you get written confirmation of this, and that it works out.Hattie_s24 wrote: »I had a legal advisor pick through my tenancy agreement this morning, and she was of the opinion that although the agreement is a joint tenancy with a break after 6, myself, the other flatmate and the landlord are listed as separate parties (3 parties rather than myself and the other girl being listed as 1) and consequently, either flatmate can invoke the 6 month break clause to remove themselves from the tenancy agreement.
but I'm surprised. Can you quote precisely what the tenancy agreement says, in relation to the various 'parties'?
I could understand if it separated the agreement into 2 contracts
* between you and the LL
* between you housemate and the LL
and each of you were liable for half the rent under your respective contracts.
And I could understand if this were truly a 'joint and several' contract
* between the 2 housemates & the LL, both equaly responsible for the full rent.
but they seem to be suggesting some combination of these two scenarios, whereby you can end your contract with the LL, leaving the other housemate's contract intact, but with the other housemate having to pick up your rent........0 -
If your housemate refuses to pay bills you could consider taking them to the small claims court. The simple threat to do so may be enough to make her pay out. If not it's pretty cheap to do.
I don't know what the chances of success are but if you're lucky in absence of any evidence to the contrary the court could rule that in effect you two had an agreement that bills would be equally shared which she is in breach of and owes you the money.0 -
In relation to the bills, you could (expecially if you are spending a lot of time away from the property, smply tell the utility companies you are moving out. Give them a final reading and close your account with them, and give them the other tenant's name to contact to set up a new account.
If you have all of the bills in your name then you are liable even if you can't get the money of her. If one or two of them are in her name then at least you can off-set what she owes you against anything you then owe her.All posts are my personal opinion, not formal advice Always get proper, professional advice (particularly about anything legal!)0 -
No shock here, head office were wrong and I can't end the contract without my flatmate's agreement.
She has agreed to another tenant providing we find a suitable one though, let's hope she's reasonable0 -
So this legal adviser, was it someone at the university, Shelter, a solicitor or someone at the letting agency?0
-
I wouldn't take the letting agents word for it. If you have sought advice from a legal advisor can they not write a letter on your behalf stating the point and giving notice, they should also request confirmation in writing of acceptance.
I may have missed it but you haven't put up the break clause so it is impossible for people to give better advice. Your legal advisor has and if they know what they are doing I would go with them.0 -
The legal advisor was from the university as part of the SU. They suggested that the meaning of the tenancy agreement was that myself and the other housemate were separate parties, but said it was not clear.
The letting agents have now decided that myself and the other tenant for the purposes of the agreement are one person, so one cannot invoke the break clause without the other's agreement (as I suspected).
I wrote a letter giving my notice to quit and it has not been accepted in writing. Instead, they phoned my housemate stating she'd have to be re-referenced for the full rent (650 a month). This did not go down well as you can imagine, as this was never going to be the situation, we were always going to find another tenant.0 -
Give Shelter a call and ask them.0
-
I have, they were of the opinion that both of us had to agree to invoke the break clause, but they didn't ask about specific wording of the break clause0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards