Unfair NPS PCN now £100

m1nt

Sorry but I dont understand your post, so to clarify - the fact the car is PCP doesnt make a difference?

If so, good and she will send the exact thing but with the IPC name:

Dear {name of IPC member, only IPC members for this version!!!}

Re PCN number:

I am not ignoring your charge for a purported parking infraction. As this is purely a charge (not a statutory penalty) issued under a purported contract and the driver has not been identified, I require the following information so that I can make an informed decision:

1. Who is the party that contracted with your company for the provision of their services? I require their contact details.
2. What is the full legal identity of the landowner?
3. As you are not the landowner please provide a contemporaneous and unredacted copy of your contract with the landholder that demonstrate that you have their authority to both issue parking charges and litigate in your own name.
4. Is your charge based on damages for breach of contract? Answer yes or no.
5. If the charge is based on damages for breach of contract please provide your justification of this sum.
6. Is your charge based on a contractually agreed sum for the provision of parking? Answer yes or no.
7. If the charge is based on a contractually agreed sum for the provision of parking please provide a valid VAT invoice for this 'service'.
8. Please provide a copy of the signs that purportedly were on site which you contend formed a contract with the driver on that occasion.

If you believe you have a cause of action, send a Letter before Claim within the next 21 days and I will take advice and will respond.

In my opinion, there is a better alternative than legal proceedings, namely that we utilise the services of a completely independent ADR service suited to parking charges. This does not include the IAS appeal service - which lacks any transparency and possibly any independence from the IPC - unlike the alternative offered by the British Parking Association, POPLA, which is transparent and has been shown to be independent.

Do not send debt collector letters and do not add any costs or surcharges. I will not respond to those, so to involve another firm would be a failure to mitigate your alleged loss. In any case, the addition of any debt collector 'costs' is not my liability because the POFA 2012 can only potentially hold a registered keeper liable if certain provisions have been met and even then, the 'amount of the parking charge' is the only amount pursuable.

Yours faithfully,

beamerguy

blowfelt wrote: »

Both.

Do you know what the four coner rule is,FOTL and what it means.

Fruitcake,Distance Selling Regs are act and statues,not law.An act is only given the force of law with the consent of the coverned meaning contract,joinder.

Coupon-mad,the OP needs to ignore your advice bc its totally utter tripe.It also tell me you must work for the 'system' for you to give such ridiculas advice.Coupon-mad,do you know the difference between legal and lawful?

blowfelt you have just lost all credibility on this forum and you cannot expect any further replies from anyone

m1nt ... the only one to take notice of is coupon-mad

pappa_golf

sorry m1nt , PCP , you mean finance on the car? , the V5 must be in the OPs name or the parking scum would have written to the finance co , and them passed it on


if the V5 is in the OPs name its ok




m1nt , no matter what you send to the scammer or IPC will be any good , I posted an email that should not have been revealed a few pages back


basically , "ok we will give them access to the IPC , for what good it will do them






send a photocopy of there "invoice" saying non patron , with the words I WAS , see you in court !

m1nt

Yes finance on the car, PCP - I'm not sure if the V5 is in her name how do I tell? I assume so as shes the only person who drives the car.

pappa_golf

if the scammers wrote to her rather than the finance Co then the v5 is in her name

dazster

blowfelt wrote: »

Do you know what the four coner rule is,FOTL and what it means.

We all know what FOTL means, it means a bunch of freaking nutters.

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Freeman

dazster

m1nt, write to Pure Gym's CEO. Point out to him that other gyms are available, and you expect him to get this ticket cancelled pronto otherwise you will not be renewing your contract with his company.

PureGym
Mr Humphrey Cobbold Chief Executive
Email humphrey@puregym.com

Town Centre House, Merrion Centre, Leeds, LS2 8LYM

dazster

blowfelt wrote: »

Well im hear to stay to try and stop ppl like you giving crap advice.

:rotfl: Time to put on your...

pappa_golf

when you are as educated as the barristers in the bevis case , and the lords , we might start listening to you , at the moment you are spouting garbage

pappa_golf

blowfelt wrote: »

You haven't commented on the Questi Que Vie Act 1666 bc you already know about this Act.

FOTL,and you believe barrister are there to help the defendant:rotfl:...
You must be more a fool than i anticipated.

Shirley , you must be thinking of Cestui Que Vie Act 1666




often quoted in a county court