Using an umbrella company to avoid child support

Kimberlay

I'm not here to argue with anyone. I thought I would get some advice that maybe might just work. I exhausted justifying this thread. Best I just go. I thought this would have helped but now I'm just upset.

Caz3121

Kimberlay wrote: »

Immediately after, He upped and left for China, set up the company and called the CSA with his £600pm pay slip. Back to square one.

Does he live and work in China?
UK does not have a REMO agreement with China so that looks like not an option
It is obviously frustrating that he has been able to walk away from responsibilities but all you can do is the best for your children and leave his conscious to him

DUTR

Kimberlay wrote: »

I'm not here to argue with anyone. I thought I would get some advice that maybe might just work. I exhausted justifying this thread. Best I just go. I thought this would have helped but now I'm just upset.

You have had help... you APPEAL however you need to have strong evidence that the income is not correct.
Look at it another way, let's say you could claim from the whole amount that you suggested, then that would be £2k a month in CS contributions, that amount is more than the average wage which many can already survive on in an average lifestyle.

Kimberlay

No it was £1000 for both. He is classed as 'working for a UK company' as his Ltd company is registered in UK. CSA/CSM have jurisdiction and not the court. I have appealed and done variations galore. It still doesn't matter with the pay slip. It's not worth it anymore as the upset is causing more trouble than it's worth. Yes his behaviour is on his conscious, not mine. He has done the same to his ex girlfriend whom he left with a toddler. I thank anyone who gave me advice. But, I think he's just too clever.

justontime

It seems genuine enough to me for the OP to feel aggrieved that her ex has managed to avoid paying a fair contribution towards the needs of his children. I can't see any justification for asking about her income or if any benefits are claimed.

I hope some of the suggestions offered may help to get a fairer outcome, but it is obviously not going to be easy.

By the way I'm a NRPP, and I know how hurtful it can be to receive unkind comments or suggestions that you are vindictive when all you want is advice. I wish people were not so quick to criticise.

Loanranger

Kimberlay, don't get stressed by the people here. Some people have nothing more to do with their time but argue the toss with anyone and everyone. Just block their posts for now and you won't see them and maybe later someone reasonable who knows what they're talking about will come along and help you.

Kimberlay

justontime wrote: »

It seems genuine enough to me for the OP to feel aggrieved that her ex has managed to avoid paying a fair contribution towards the needs of his children. I can't see any justification for asking about her income or if any benefits are claimed.

I hope some of the suggestions offered may help to get a fairer outcome, but it is obviously not going to be easy.

By the way I'm a NRPP, and I know how hurtful it can be to receive unkind comments or suggestions that you are vindictive when all you want is advice. I wish people were not so quick to criticise.

Thanks for your kind words. I think he may actually have beaten the system with this one. I've done every suggestion on this thread already. The CSA/CSM conveniently 'lost' our case files before going to court. Ah well, I'm gonna make myself a coffee and not give him anymore airtime.

Kimberlay

Loanranger wrote: »

Kimberlay, don't get stressed by the people here. Some people have nothing more to do with their time but argue the toss with anyone and everyone. Just block their posts for now and you won't see them and maybe later someone reasonable who knows what they're talking about will come along and help you.

Thanks, I'm brand new on here so I don't know how to block or report any horrible posts. :cool:

POPPYOSCAR

DUTR wrote: »

You know, you posts are appearing trollish with the drip feeding, the Airline would have some contract with Kimberlayex ltd of which your ex is a the director chairperson whatever, he gets a taxable income of £609 per month of which the csa make an assesment.
It's been suggested many times that you appeal, you are quick to spout his business (and know a lot about it as an ex) yet what you do and how much you earn is not public, this doesn't appear to be about CS contribution (as no child froze or starved to death through lack of contribution from the NRP) it appears between the lines that it is yet another vindictive ex trying to find ways to spite an ex after a relationship has failed for whatever reasons.

Very much so.

DUTR

justontime wrote: »

It seems genuine enough to me for the OP to feel aggrieved that her ex has managed to avoid paying a fair contribution towards the needs of his children. I can't see any justification for asking about her income or if any benefits are claimed.

I hope some of the suggestions offered may help to get a fairer outcome, but it is obviously not going to be easy.

By the way I'm a NRPP, and I know how hurtful it can be to receive unkind comments or suggestions that you are vindictive when all you want is advice. I wish people were not so quick to criticise.

There is the relationship board for empathy hugs though surely?
The OP has probably already done all they can from what they have posted, it doesn't look like anything has been overlooked, yeah we could all post 'he's a rotter' etc but that isn't going to change the bureaucratic policy that is already in place.