We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Richer Sounds- amazing bargains in theri clearance section

Options
24

Comments

  • gromituk
    gromituk Posts: 3,087 Forumite
    akabee wrote: »
    If there was a chance of exploding batteries the item would be banned.
    That much is true, but it doesn't detract from the fact that trying to recharge dry cells is pointless given the variety of proper rechargeable cells that are available.

    As to watch batteries, this is one of the few applications where it is more sensible to use non-rechargeables: where they last for a year or more. Here, the self-discharge of a rechargeable becomes significant.
    Time is an illusion - lunch time doubly so.
  • copthis1
    copthis1 Posts: 76 Forumite
    Why is it that a lot of these posts dissolve into the 'green issue'. I get fed up having to wade through a post weeding out the bits about bargains (which this site is about) and some bloke demanding we stop buying/using something which will contribute massively to the saving of our planet.

    It would be far simpler if a post consisted of price, location, any good, anywhere cheaper not 'if you dont fart for a week we may get snow at christmas'
  • dc
    dc Posts: 2,547 Forumite
    akabee wrote: »
    I am not into the green hype but you seem to be listening to the battery companies hype.
    If you are selling a product in the UK it has to pass a series of tests, If there was a chance of exploding batteries the item would be banned.

    Maplins have a cheaper greener charger only £9.99
    http://www.maplin.co.uk/module.aspx?ModuleNo=10438&doy=26m8#overview

    Sorry to OP for going off topic. But,


    NO, I am a chartered electrical engineer and know what I am talking about.

    The warnings are for safety reasons, not to con you.

    Batteries ARE safe, WHEN being used for the purpose they were supplied for, hence ordinary carbon-zinc and alkaline types not recommended or really suitable to re-charge, hence the warnings. You would get just as much extra use as your recommended devices by heating you batteries too, again not recommended.

    So you save 20p on a 30p battery by spending £15?, and still have to throw it away, your choice.;)

    When being recharged ALL batteries emit gasses some of which can cause explosions, especially lead acid. Lithium batteries are highly explosive when mis-treated, yet still are sold with every computer.
    ac's lovechild
  • real1314
    real1314 Posts: 4,432 Forumite
    Non-rechargeable should be used in preference to rechargeables for low drain uses - e.g clocks, remote controls. Rechargeables will run out more quickly in these situations, needing frequent re-charging, thus using more electricity.
  • gromituk
    gromituk Posts: 3,087 Forumite
    copthis1 wrote: »
    Why is it that a lot of these posts dissolve into the 'green issue'. I get fed up having to wade through a post weeding out the bits about bargains (which this site is about)
    Could it possibly be because buying rechargeable batteries is the bargain of the century compared with feeding power-hungry appliances with "bargain" packs of dry cells?
    Time is an illusion - lunch time doubly so.
  • akabee
    akabee Posts: 972 Forumite
    500 Posts
    Join the VIP club and get links to vouchers and special offers in your inbox.
    http://www.richersounds.com/information.php?cda=static&cst=mailshot&SID=16357c6929ba0f102b716da7592389e7
    Sorry lynzpower off topic again
    dc wrote: »
    Sorry to OP for going off topic. But,


    NO, I am a chartered electrical engineer and know what I am talking about.

    The warnings are for safety reasons, not to con you.

    Batteries ARE safe, WHEN being used for the purpose they were supplied for, hence ordinary carbon-zinc and alkaline types not recommended or really suitable to re-charge, hence the warnings. You would get just as much extra use as your recommended devices by heating you batteries too, again not recommended.

    So you save 20p on a 30p battery by spending £15?, and still have to throw it away, your choice.;)

    When being recharged ALL batteries emit gasses some of which can cause explosions, especially lead acid. Lithium batteries are highly explosive when mis-treated, yet still are sold with every computer.

    If you are an chartered electrical engineer you should have posted your second post first.
    I thought the "frought with danger of explosion" might worry people who already have a charger/regenerator.

    The chargers/regenerators for normal batteries on sale a few years ago had problems with overheating and were withdrawn. They have now been fixed/upgraded and they all have warnings on the packets (& optional gas mask):p

    PS stop giving terrorists ideas "Lithium batteries are highly explosive when mis-treated":eek:
  • gromituk
    gromituk Posts: 3,087 Forumite
    akabee wrote: »
    PS stop giving terrorists ideas "Lithium batteries are highly explosive when mis-treated":eek:
    That's hardly news! Petrol is also highly explosive when mis-treated, and a good deal cheaper than lithium batteries...
    Time is an illusion - lunch time doubly so.
  • antenna
    antenna Posts: 1,776 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    10's of thousands of rechargable batteries are thrown away every year...........and they are 1000 times more damaging to the enviroment than ordinary zinc carbon batteries..........
    Political?....I dont do Political....well,not much!
  • italiastar
    italiastar Posts: 1,448 Forumite
    Sorry, but are we not going a bit OFF TOPIC here ?
  • antenna wrote: »
    10's of thousands of rechargable batteries are thrown away every year...........and they are 1000 times more damaging to the enviroment than ordinary zinc carbon batteries..........

    According to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rechargeable_batteries NiCd batteries can be recharged 1500 times so even if they are 1000 times more damaging than zinc carbon when thrown away they would appear to be better overall.

    What do you mean by '1000 times more harmful'?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.