We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
So...
Comments
-
Most of the PPC abuses as listed above could be stopped if current ANPR systems were banned as an enforcement mechanism. It is after all fundamentally flawed as it can never accurately measure the time the car is actually parked. It is forbidden for council enforcement.
There are schemes that would ensure fairness for the motorist but little profit for the PPCs e.g. exit barriers as per most multi-storey car parks or shutting the gate at night when the car park owner doesn't want peple using the car park.
is this stated anywhere officially & publicly?0 -
-
arthurx1234 wrote: »Taken from article
Here is Lord Neuberger's advice:ParkingEye has an appeals procedure, and the BPA Code of Practice provides at paragraph 13.4 for a reasonable grace period after the expiry of the fixed parking period. The appeals procedure provides a degree of protection for any overstayer, who would be able to cite any special circumstances as a reason for avoiding the charge. And, while the Code of Practice is not a contractual document, it is in practice binding on the operator since its existence and observance is a condition of his ability to obtain details of the registered keeper from the DVLA.
So the whole COP is binding??? surely not, but hope so!!
Arthur
Dont forget that the COP is up for editing when it doesn't suit the members of the BPA Limited, dont be at all surprised to see some hefty edits in the next updateFrom the Plain Language Commission:
"The BPA has surely become one of the most socially dangerous organisations in the UK"0 -
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2960986/Thousands-rip-parking-fines-dished-town-hall-car-parks-illegally-using-automatic-number-plate-recognition.htmlis this stated anywhere officially & publicly?
Not that I'm a Daily Mail reader:-) That was the first link I found that explained the situation when I Googled.0 -
trisontana wrote: »All I can say is have you ever seen a council car park with ANPR cameras?
I believe there is a multi-storey one in High Wycombe.0 -
trisontana wrote: »All I can say is have you ever seen a council car park with ANPR cameras?http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2960986/Thousands-rip-parking-fines-dished-town-hall-car-parks-illegally-using-automatic-number-plate-recognition.html
Not that I'm a Daily Mail reader:-) That was the first link I found that explained the situation when I Googled.
What I was getting at, is that if there was an official letter/instruction from the government to councils etc stating that they are not to use ANPR themselves, or allow their contractors to use it, then it will state the reasons.
Those reasons, along with it being an official 'instruction', should be enough to get any tickets/invoices issued using ANPR systems dismissed by any appeals process or court.
A court may even state that no tickets/invoices issued through the use of such systems are valid, ending the use of ANPR systems.0 -
That link is to the letter written by the relevant government minister (Robert Goodwill) to all local councils reminding them that ANPR is not to be used.What I was getting at, is that if there was an official letter/instruction from the government to councils etc stating that they are not to use ANPR themselves, or allow their contractors to use it, then it will state the reasons.
Those reasons, along with it being an official 'instruction', should be enough to get any tickets/invoices issued using ANPR systems dismissed by any appeals process or court.
A court may even state that no tickets/invoices issued through the use of such systems are valid, ending the use of ANPR systems.0 -
What I was getting at, is that if there was an official letter/instruction from the government to councils etc stating that they are not to use ANPR themselves, or allow their contractors to use it, then it will state the reasons.
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/416617/operational-guidance.pdf
Paragraph 8.86 sets out the circumstances in which local authorities may carry out decriminalised parking enforcement by means of "approved devices" (i.e. cameras). These are:
• a bus lane;
• a bus stop clearway or bus stand clearway;
• a Keep Clear zig-zag area outside schools; or
• a red route.
And that's it.
Furthermore the government's letter to all local authorities dated 16/09/14 lays down that they may not take their car parks out of statutory control:
http://notomob.co.uk/discussions/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=4512.0;attach=5128
Put these two things together and the upshot is that councils can't use ANPR in their car parks.
Wycombe Council arrogantly ignored all this with the result that they are no longer permitted to access vehicle keeper details from DVLA. In other words, their ANPR cameras now serve a purely decorative function despite the millions spent on them.Je suis Charlie.0 -
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/416617/operational-guidance.pdf
Paragraph 8.86 sets out the circumstances in which local authorities may carry out decriminalised parking enforcement by means of "approved devices" (i.e. cameras). These are:
• a bus lane;
• a bus stop clearway or bus stand clearway;
• a Keep Clear zig-zag area outside schools; or
• a red route.
And that's it.
Furthermore the government's letter to all local authorities dated 16/09/14 lays down that they may not take their car parks out of statutory control:
http://notomob.co.uk/discussions/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=4512.0;attach=5128
Put these two things together and the upshot is that councils can't use ANPR in their car parks.
Wycombe Council arrogantly ignored all this with the result that they are no longer permitted to access vehicle keeper details from DVLA. In other words, their ANPR cameras now serve a purely decorative function despite the millions spent on them.
thats all that I was able to find as well.
We have a letter from a minister reminding councils that they cant use ANPR etc in car parks, but not the why0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards