UKPC At It Again

HO87

As now included in PP's updated blog

http://www.gethampshire.co.uk/news/local-news/driver-successfully-appeals-unauthorised-100-9318812

enfield_freddy

do POPLa not report those things back to the BPA?


once is an accident


twice is fraud

bazster

Hampshire County Council does not list Damson Drive as a road maintained at the public expense, but that could simply be them being dilatory in updating their database given that it appears to be a very new road.

fisherjim

bazster wrote: »

Hampshire County Council does not list Damson Drive as a road maintained at the public expense, but that could simply be them being dilatory in updating their database given that it appears to be a very new road.

Also it cannot be accessed on Google Streetview suggesting private land.
I suppose it depends when the council adopt the roads from the developer.
However UKPC are as ever (and I believe this is deliberate in hoping to trap victims) up a Gumtree with their signage, and other lack of evidence.

The_Slithy_Tove

fisherjim wrote: »

Also it cannot be accessed on Google Streetview suggesting private land.
I suppose it depends when the council adopt the roads from the developer.

The fact that there is clearly a council No Waiting sign on the lamppost suggests that it has. Needs absolute confirmation from Hampshire CC, though.

enfield_freddy

I will ask once again , when POPLa find that the operator is working on land he is not supposed to , and as per the press report issued 2 or more tickets , why are they not reporting the company responsible back to the BPA , so that they can sanction them


how many of those cases have been paid , or not gone to POPLa




"UKPC refused to cancel their parking charge notices and repeated the false allegations and their demands for money so two of the affected drivers have now filed Crime Reports for investigation by the National Fraud Intelligence Bureau. UKPC and the Parking Attendant are both cited as the perpetrators


or are they reporting back , but we are playing "fudge" time


golf anyone!

HO87

fisherjim wrote: »

Also it cannot be accessed on Google Streetview suggesting private land.

Private/unadopted roads that aren't included are generally greyed out when looked at in map view and don't show the blue SV markings in satellite. This is a recent build and is more likely, I think, to be missing because it hasn't yet been covered. The satellite shots are also devoid of the development.