We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Has the stock market peaked?
Comments
-
"If you exclude dividends the FTSE looks flat" = "If you exclude icing and batter carrot cake just tastes of carrots". Why would you?
If the poster has indeed doubled their capital while spending all the dividends on stuff, then that is impressive, but there was no indication of that.
The graph I looked at was for the FTSE All Share Total Return Index which is up 92% over ten years. An index fund would return slightly lower due to charges, but we are talking about DIY investing where the only charge is the investor's own time cost.0 -
ukx has to go to hold 6370 through eod. Next target 6400 seems a long way off. I decided to sell my whole portfolio of stocks late this afternoon, now I will sit on my hands and buy lower. Really nice to wrap up at a profit and to hold that profit.
Looks like you sold too early; market up strongly today after hints of more QE from the ECB. It's really difficult to try and guess the market. No idea why you think 6370 is a peak when FTSE was over 7000 a while back?? I'd say the UK market is still cheap baring some unexpected calamity.0 -
Malthusian wrote: »"If you exclude dividends the FTSE looks flat" = "If you exclude icing and batter carrot cake just tastes of carrots". Why would you?
If the poster has indeed doubled their capital while spending all the dividends on stuff, then that is impressive, but there was no indication of that.
The graph I looked at was for the FTSE All Share Total Return Index which is up 92% over ten years. An index fund would return slightly lower due to charges, but we are talking about DIY investing where the only charge is the investor's own time cost.
Looking at the FTSE All Share theres a substantial difference from 2005 to 2006...infact it looks like 20%.
http://www.google.co.uk/finance?q=INDEXFTSE%3AASX
load this up from 2006 ..
http://www.trustnet.com/Tools/Charting.aspx?typeCode=NASX0 -
Looking at the FTSE All Share theres a substantial difference from 2005 to 2006...infact it looks like 20%.
Google allows a link to the specific time period fwiw, +18% or there about within the year, 20.37% if just either side.
Long URL showing UK all share index 2005-2006'We don't need to be smarter than the rest; we need to be more disciplined than the rest.' - WB0 -
If you look at the charting tool on trustnet you can get graphs of funds and some indexes with and without dividend re-investment going back in some cases to the early 1990's.
Kittie's 2006 was near the top of the FTSE100 valuation whereas 2010 was just after the credit crunch crash so it's hardly fair to compare the two and claim one's fund has done better in less time.
From Trustnet since April 2006 the FTSE250 has doubled with dividend reinvestment whereas the FTSE100 again with dividend re-investment is up 50%. It does depend a fair bit on when in 2006.
Interesting that since 2006 all the indexes I looked at (FTSE100, EM, Europe, World, Far East) other than the FTSE250 performed very similarly.0 -
Also on Kitty's strategy - she sold yesterday because the FTSE100 didnt zoom through 6400 (or 6370). It has today! If only she had waited a day...0
-
-
Also on Kitty's strategy - she sold yesterday because the FTSE100 didnt zoom through 6400 (or 6370). It has today! If only she had waited a day...
Or sold when it was above 7,000, why on earth sell yesterday after watching it break through 7,000 a few months ago. For the record I don't buy into the short term selling view, but if I did, I would have sold back then.Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop0 -
chucknorris wrote: »Or sold when it was above 7,000, why on earth sell yesterday after watching it break through 7,000 a few months ago. For the record I don't buy into the short term selling view, but if I did, I would have sold back then.
Ah well you see that is my personal strategy, I am always very happy with the bit in the middle ie I neither try to get the top of a trend nor the bottom. Believe me I was extremely happy to be safely banking a very large profit indeed. All my limit buys are in place now, good for 90 days and I`ll just carry on living my life while the sipp computers deal with my orders
Certainly works for me, obviously not risky enough for some, depends on outlook, age, pot size, circumstances. This is a pension in actual drawdown so I do have a primal need to be a conservative these days, unlike my early days of trading the dow0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
