Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

HPC thread of the week

Options
17879818384104

Comments

  • cells
    cells Posts: 5,246 Forumite
    Do you think buying in "most of the rest of the country that is cheap", or however you put it, around 2007 made sense?


    it depends what you were after.

    As a geared investment, it would have been a poor return to buy in the half of the country that is cheap (NE NW WM EM Y&H). You would have been much better off buying in London or the SE

    However to live in it probably was not a bad idea. You would be down on capital value but enjoyed nearly a decade of low mortgage payments and have owned for a decade rather than rented which has some value even if to you it does not


    BTW we need to see what happens over the next 5 years. We may find that these cheap regions where it costs only 2-4 x wages will grow in price very rapidly (as they did in 2000-2004) and the picture may look different in 2020
  • cells
    cells Posts: 5,246 Forumite
    edited 19 January 2016 at 6:15PM
    If anyone's interested these are my raw numbers from above:


    value annual rent yield hypo 100% mortgage start interest principal balance cashflow diff renting over buying
    2004 425,000 22,100 5.2% 475,575 4.50% £425,000 £18,932 £9,415 £415,585 £443,932 -6,247
    2005 453,475 22,100 4.9% 505,958 4.50% £415,585 £18,500 £9,848 £405,737 £462,432 -6,247
    2006 483,858 24,700 5.1% 560,476 4.75% £405,737 £19,057 £9,972 £395,765 £481,490 -4,329
    2007 516,276 24,700 4.8% 619,767 4.75% £395,765 £18,573 £10,456 £385,309 £500,063 -4,329
    2008 550,867 24,700 4.5% 681,375 3.79% £385,309 £14,406 £11,439 £373,870 £514,469 -1,145
    2009 587,775 27,000 4.6% 745,456 1.29% £373,870 £4,726 £16,493 £357,377 £519,194 5,781
    2010 627,156 27,000 4.3% 814,475 1.29% £357,377 £4,512 £16,707 £340,670 £523,706 5,781
    2011 669,175 27,000 4.0% 886,310 1.29% £340,670 £4,295 £16,924 £323,747 £528,001 5,781
    2012 714,010 27,000 3.8% 961,149 1.29% £323,747 £4,075 £17,143 £306,603 £532,076 5,781
    2013 761,849 30,000 3.9% 1,039,193 1.29% £306,603 £3,853 £17,366 £289,238 £535,929 8,781
    2014 812,893 30,000 3.7% 1,123,656 1.29% £289,238 £3,627 £17,591 £271,646 £539,556 8,781
    2015 867,356 30,000 3.5% 1,211,769 1.29% £271,646 £3,399 £17,819 £253,827 £542,955 8,781
    2016 925,469 28,800 1,303,776 1.29% £253,827 £3,168 £18,051 £235,776 £546,123 7,581
    2017 987,476



    thanks, just a tip if you put it into say excel (or any free alternative) and take a screenshot (of just the table, not of the whole screen) and post that it will be easer to follow/read. no need to do it this time just for future posts with lots of data like that
  • cells
    cells Posts: 5,246 Forumite
    the problem with analysing things that impact upon yourself is that you will fall pray to a lot of confirmation bias.

    That is to say if you think house prices are high you will go and find evidence to suggest that is the case and a lot of nutters on the internet to back up your views

    The same is true if you think house prices will go up you will likely pay a little more attention to the data confirming that.


    The only slight difference between the two groups is that people who see upside are only betting on flat to increasing (even if a tiny bit) prices whereas people who see a downside are betting on prices falling 20%-80%.
  • cells wrote: »
    thanks, just a tip if you put it into say excel (or any free alternative) and take a screenshot (of just the table, not of the whole screen) and post that it will be easer to follow/read. no need to do it this time just for future posts with lots of data like that

    Thanks for the tip. I am posting via a work PC that won'd display the page properly - something to do with the version of the browser (which I can't change).
  • Sibley
    Sibley Posts: 1,557 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary Combo Breaker
    The no interest rise will rattle their cages.....

    Popcorn at the ready....
    We love Sarah O Grady
  • mwpt
    mwpt Posts: 2,502 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary Combo Breaker
    Another one bites the dust:

    Screen_Shot_2016_01_21_at_14_59_58.png

    I did some searching and again this poster seems to have had a run in with TheCountOfNowhere. I assume TCON just thinks anyone who doesn't agree with him is a troll and reports them. Mods then ban willy nilly.

    http://www.housepricecrash.co.uk/forum/index.php?/topic/203556-are-the-shires-crashing/page-19#entry1102730885
  • Crashy_Time
    Crashy_Time Posts: 13,386 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Name Dropper
    mwpt wrote: »
    Another one bites the dust:

    Screen_Shot_2016_01_21_at_14_59_58.png

    I did some searching and again this poster seems to have had a run in with TheCountOfNowhere. I assume TCON just thinks anyone who doesn't agree with him is a troll and reports them. Mods then ban willy nilly.

    http://www.housepricecrash.co.uk/forum/index.php?/topic/203556-are-the-shires-crashing/page-19#entry1102730885


    Which sock puppet, sorry poster, do you mean, the one posting or the one banned?
  • mwpt
    mwpt Posts: 2,502 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary Combo Breaker
    Which sock puppet, sorry poster, do you mean, the one posting or the one banned?

    On second thoughts, maybe I was a little harsh on TCON. My guess, this is the very post that got king_of_stretham banned.

    http://www.housepricecrash.co.uk/forum/index.php?/topic/207774-buy-to-let-investors-to-challenge-tax-hike-in-court-merged-threads/?p=1102855021

    You'll also have noted that all subsequent posts by the new user and responses to it have been removed.

    Your subconscious knows how that site works crashy. You know you're listening to carefully selected and groomed views. You just can't take the next step of admitting it to yourself consciously.
  • mwpt wrote: »
    On second thoughts, maybe I was a little harsh on TCON. My guess, this is the very post that got king_of_stretham banned.

    http://www.housepricecrash.co.uk/forum/index.php?/topic/207774-buy-to-let-investors-to-challenge-tax-hike-in-court-merged-threads/?p=1102855021

    You'll also have noted that all subsequent posts by the new user and responses to it have been removed.

    Your subconscious knows how that site works crashy. You know you're listening to carefully selected and groomed views. You just can't take the next step of admitting it to yourself consciously.
    I think it's called confirmation bias. Crashy would do well to look it up.
  • The bitter HPC goons are now laying into new first time buyers queueing up to buy their first dream home and take their first crucial steps onto the housing ladder. These prize twits will never be happy seeing others knuckling down and getting on with their lives.

    Bitter and twisted thread:

    http://www.housepricecrash.co.uk/forum/index.php?/topic/208159-300-people-camp-out-in-cold-weather-to-buy-29-homes/page-1
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.