We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
ParkingEye v Beavis at the Supreme Court: What’s Happening This Week
Options
Comments
-
That's Barry's bloke!0
-
Yeah thats John De Waal, does sound like he is getting a bashing though.0
-
the blonde lady (Joanna Smith) has been there 2 days ago in his position in the Makadessi case , so knows what he is going through , plus is partly representing the consumers association0
-
the blonde lady (Joanna Smith) has been there 2 days ago in his position in the Makadessi case , so knows what he is going through , plus is partly representing the consumers association
Don't think it's her Red - it's Julia Smith to rep for the CA.Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street0 -
Don't think it's her Red - it's Julia Smith to rep for the CA.
ok, shame the names are so close, but my point is that she is the Q.C. that was stood at the podium 2 days ago , so is involved in the Makadessi case and these ongoing arguments
I had written Julia, then changed it to Joanna due to the person sat behind John De Waal being Joanna
http://www.wilberforce.co.uk/staff/joanna-smith-qc/0 -
Marktheshark wrote: »Lets hope someone points out that "council tickets" they drabbed on about at the other appeals are a penalty, a punishment designed to punish an offender.
Just being covered now- referring to Chelmsford council charges- i.e. £25/£50.
Glad that's been brought to their attention.0 -
The blonde is remarkably similar to the one who Represented Cavendish0
-
Why isn't de Waal raising the fact that if the charge was consideration it would be revenue and subject to Vat?0
-
Think h might be about to allude to it. Seems to be laying out the grounds on contracts at moment.ColliesCarer wrote: »Why isn't de Waal raising the fact that if the charge was consideration it would be revenue and subject to Vat?
Might be he's setting a trap for HMRC to trigger later .0 -
I get the feeling the fact the Lords quizzed him from the get go he got a bit muddled, would put anyone off.
Joanna would have been loving it because shes basically on Parking Eye's side... if they can really be said to be on the same side.
Anyone with more experience of these things rate how De Waal is doing so far?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards