We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Disabling contactless payment on credit/debit cards
Options
Comments
-
Contactless cards have been around for quite a while now, not seen many horror stories about huge amounts of fraud, has anyone else ?
I was in the local Post Office on Monday and used my AMEX contactless and they told me that one of the big scam purchases for contactless is lottery tickets.
It has always seemed to me to be odd to have chip and pin which is supposed to be more secure than the old magswipe, yet completely undermine the principle by putting on technology that doesn't even check the card presenter is the authorized card owner.0 -
Or perhaps try calling your card issuer / bank and request a non-contactless card ?
http://www.theguardian.com/money/2015/jan/17/contactless-payments-banks-force-usI'm a Board Guide on the Credit Cards, Loans, Credit Files & Ratings boards. I'm a volunteer to help the boards run smoothly, and I can move and merge threads there. Any views are mine and not the official line of moneysavingexpert.com0 -
Candyapple wrote: »Or perhaps try calling your card issuer / bank and request a non-contactless card ?
http://www.theguardian.com/money/2015/jan/17/contactless-payments-banks-force-us
That was the first thing I did, the card issuer does not have a non-contactless option. It only option for me was to ditch 'n' switch or cut the antenna. I did the latter and I'm all happy again.0 -
0
-
It has always seemed to me to be odd to have chip and pin which is supposed to be more secure than the old magswipe, yet completely undermine the principle by putting on technology that doesn't even check the card presenter is the authorized card owner.
Do <i>any</i> cards use technology which checks the presenter is the owner? How?My postings reflect my lifetime's experience and my opinion. You are quite welcome to respond with your experiences and option, whether similar or different.0 -
From The UK Cards Association website -
Instances of fraud on contactless cards are extremely rare, with the latest figures showing that contactless fraud totalled £51,000 over the first six months of 2014 - just 0.007 per cent of contactless card spending. However, if a card is lost or stolen, consumers are protected against fraud loss - they will not be liable for any fraudulent use and should report it to their card issuer as soon as possible.0 -
From The UK Cards Association website -
Instances of fraud on contactless cards are extremely rare, with the latest figures showing that contactless fraud totalled £51,000 over the first six months of 2014 - just 0.007 per cent of contactless card spending. However, if a card is lost or stolen, consumers are protected against fraud loss - they will not be liable for any fraudulent use and should report it to their card issuer as soon as possible.
Firstly, this is only for the identified fraud. I'm sure there is a lot of fraud that goes unnoticed. Secondly, I am extremely doubtful over the £51k of fraud.
From the same source (http://www.theukcardsassociation.org.uk/plastic_fraud_figures/index.asp).
Total UK fraud on lost or stolen cards for the past few years are:
2014: £60 million
2013: £59 million
2012: £55 million
2011: £50 million
Let's assume £30 million fraud for lost/stolen cards was for the first 6 months of 2014. To use that card fraudulently, they'd some how have to obtain the PIN or they could use the contactless payment option which requires no further information.
I honestly doubt contactless fraud only accounts for £51k of the £30 million fraud for lost/stolen cards.
The protection in fraud loss only kicks if you identify the fraud. I'm sure there's many instances of fraud that occur that are not identified at all.
I'd much prefer fraud prevention (proactive) than fraud loss protection (reactive).0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards