We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Freeze on car engine CO2 improvements

Does anyone believe the new VED bands:

http://www.nextgreencar.com/news/7138/summer-budget-2015-new-car-and-fuel-tax-rates/

Will allow motor manufacturers to suspend engineering improvements to engine CO2 emissions? Bad for the environment but great if you consider that complexity under the hood could see the return in the UK of much simpler cheaper engines something that an old fashioned garage mechanic can repair without any need for a computer.
:eek:
«134

Comments

  • motorguy
    motorguy Posts: 22,650
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Forumite
    edited 31 October 2024 at 12:25PM
    Does anyone believe the new VED bands:

    http://www.nextgreencar.com/news/7138/summer-budget-2015-new-car-and-fuel-tax-rates/

    Will allow motor manufacturers to suspend engineering improvements to engine CO2 emissions? Bad for the environment but great if you consider that complexity under the hood could see the return in the UK of much simpler cheaper engines something that an old fashioned garage mechanic can repair without any need for a computer.
    :eek:

    This may come as a surprise to you, but the worlds motoring industry does not revolve around what happens here on this island, so i dont think a tweak in our tax bands is going to matter a whole pile in the grand scheme of things
  • Hi Motorguy

    Yes I agree could even be some EC regulation that forces improvements on the manufacturer. It just that my daughter has a beat up X reg 1999 Fiat that has an engine with loads of space around it something you don't see in new cars. When things go wrong the car is always repairable at very little cost.

    If somebody could make a 1999 technology car something that might sell to the developing world why not sell it here? If the government has abandoned emissions incentives on cars why not.
  • AdrianC
    AdrianC Posts: 42,189
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Forumite
    motorguy wrote: »
    This may come as a surprise to you, but the worlds motoring industry does not revolve around what happens here on this island, so i dont think a tweak in our tax bands is going to matter a whole pile in the grand scheme of things
    Indeed.
    UK new car sales 2014 - 2.5m
    EU new car sales 2014 - 12.5m
    Global new car sales 2014 - 79m
  • RichardD1970
    RichardD1970 Posts: 3,797
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Forumite
    All car manufacturers selling in the EU will have to have a fleet average CO2 of 95 grams by 2021 or face very expensive fines.
  • fred246
    fred246 Posts: 3,620
    Sixth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Forumite
    I think the budget was all about being popular. He was trying to appeal to motorists and the message he is sending is 'Forget all about CO2'. I think if you read all the comments after a story on global warming that is what people WANT to hear. I think a lot of people who were buying small economical cars will be a bit upset. Adds £140 a year to their motoring. Did the chancellor give any explanation for the change?
  • chrisw
    chrisw Posts: 4,067
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Forumite
    The trouble is that more and more cars are falling into the current zero ved band. My Volvo has 181bhp but 99g CO2 and therefore zero road tax. The books had to be rebalanced at some point.
  • AdrianC
    AdrianC Posts: 42,189
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Forumite
    fred246 wrote: »
    I think a lot of people who were buying small economical cars will be a bit upset. Adds £140 a year to their motoring.

    Only if they buy those cars, new, after 2017.
    Did the chancellor give any explanation for the change?

    Oh, just that the current VED scheme is irretrievably broken, with the majority of new cars being zero-first-year, and an ever increasing proportion being zero or peanuts.
  • Johnmcl7
    Johnmcl7 Posts: 2,854
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Forumite
    According to the table in that article, for new cars the difference in Co2 is going to be much larger than the current system. My previous car was a 170bhp diesel estate and ved was around £180, I replaced it with a similar 170bhp petrol estate which is £260 for the VED so £270 more over three years. Under the new system, the diesel would be £500 and the petrol even though it's nothing fancy would be a whopping £1200 so the cost of VED for the petrol is going to be a lot more than it is now.

    I'm puzzled by still using CO2 figures for the first year's VED given there's been a lot of articles recently that show the push for lower CO2 was an error as the problem now is nitrous oxide emissions are too high particularly in city centres.

    John
  • AdrianC
    AdrianC Posts: 42,189
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Forumite
    If your idea of this "nothing fancy" petrol estate includes a list price of £40k+, of course...

    You're right that the wholesale move to diesel has caused high NOx, but by 2017 everything new'll be Euro6 emissions, so very low NOx. 0.08g/km. 2000's Euro3 standard was the first to cap NOx - at 0.5g/km, halved for Euro4 in 2005.
  • colino
    colino Posts: 5,059
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Forumite
    Government legislation is always a factor in global car development, if it comes from important markets. When California developed/imposed its anti-smog laws, US companies bolted catalytic converters onto their ancient, inefficient V8s and everyone else had to do the same. Real, progressive engineering companies, like Honda, who had developed lean burn engines threw up their hands in horror, petitioned the senate and fell into line.
    Now we have diesels spewing out more and more soot as they are stretched to become as powerful as their petrol cousins, but are now"modified" with dpfs and additional harmful chemicals to reduce the visible expulsions. Guess what? These even finer particulates are being recognised as more harmful to human health as they are more readily absorbed by the lungs.
    Make no mistake, if a government can make money and is heavily lobbied by industry, it makes stupid, groundless laws. It has nothing to do with health, well-being or saving the planet.
This discussion has been closed.
★ ★ ★ Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 355.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 456.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 248.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 606K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 179K Life & Family
  • 263.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.