We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
market rents budget
Comments
-
Sounds like your beef isn't with this policy, but with the property market as a whole.Shame thats as far as you can see
Well, I'm very sorry about that. But continuing to shelter you from the reality won't help you one bit, nor will it make the slightest bit of difference. You CHOSE to live in one of the most expensive cities in the world. Your income makes it eminently possible for you to have a good choice of very pleasant accomodation. Why SHOULD the taxpayer continue to help you out, when you don't actually need their help?0 -
I don't disagree with you but IMO London should not be treated as a special case.Cheeky_Monkey wrote: »Boo hoo
Why should your rent continue to be massively subsidised when you are earning good money. Afterall, if you weren't a higher rate tax payer you wouldn't be in this position.
Why should people be able to earn £10k more inside London than anyone else that lives in a high rent area such as the South East. The new rules appear to be £30k income outside London and £40k inside London.
Seems to me the Twittering London dinner set are looking after their own and f*ck the rest of the country.No changer there then..;)0 -
Point of order... Somebody earning £40k isn't necessarily a higher-rate tax payer - only if they have £2,400 or more deducted from their personal allowance. Two people each earning £20k definitely aren't - less than half of their income is subject to any income tax, so their personal tax rate is <10%.
Point of order accepted. However, according to previous posts by the OP, they are indeed a higher rate tax payer. I did actually check that before I posted
:beer: 0 -
And there you get into a whole extra can of worms. Cost of living in the London orbit is near-on London, but pay often isn't. "The Living Wage" is London/non-London. "London weighting" on salaries. etc etc etc.leveller2911 wrote: »...but IMO London should not be treated as a special case.
Why should people be able to earn £10k more inside London than anyone else that lives in a high rent area such as the South East. The new rules appear to be £30k income outside London and £40k inside London.
Short of getting seriously granular, though, how to solve it? Or do people doing the essential lower-paid jobs in London just get shafted for it?0 -
So as for the OP's whole "two people earning £20k each" - in which he does, actually, have a fair point. That's below average full-time income for the country as a whole...Cheeky_Monkey wrote: »Point of order accepted. However, according to previous posts by the OP, they are indeed a higher rate tax payer. I did actually check that before I posted0 -
So we have to move do we due to government greed this was not a subsidy more like what everyone should be paying if the uk market was not so greedy look at Germany we pay about double for somewhere to live not luxury as stated to old for mortgage put yourself in someone elses shoes and see if you woud be a happy bunny .
Nothing to do with Government greed. Just Government debt. Well to be precise the welfare bill that the UK is committed to.0 -
So as for the OP's whole "two people earning £20k each" - in which he does, actually, have a fair point. That's below average full-time income for the country as a whole...
Which is precisely the reason I've said they should live somewhere more affordable.
I'd quite like to rent in Knightsbridge but, guess what, I can't afford it. Maybe I should start a thread whinging about how hard done by I have been by the Govt.0 -
OP - once the new rules come into force, you won't have any choice but to pay the extra rent so you might as well quit whining.
Actually, you do have a choice. You could always relinquish your Council/HA property and move further out of London to somewhere cheaper where you could comfortably afford to rent a nicer place in a nicer location privately.
That way, your property could be given to someone who actually needs it.
Win - Win :j0 -
if you post your monthly budget here stating where you spend your money I'm sure we can give you good advice on which expenses you can cut to afford your new rent
you can't expect the taxpayer to subsidise your lifestyle indefinitely, you should consider yourself lucky for what you've enjoyed so far, which most people in this country have never had0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards