We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

HELP!! Bank withholding money

Hi
I am posting for a friend who played an online gambling site and won £600.
She banked the money and was expecting it 5-7 days later. After 10 days she contacted the bank and was told that the funds were received but it has been flagged up by SWIFT so she would be sent some forms to sign to say that there r are no suspicious circumstances and they would release the money within 5 days.
That was 5/6 weeks ago and they still haven't released them!
They are saying they are still investigating. But won't tell her anymore information.
Are the bank allowed to do this?
What Are the steps they have to follow?
Is there something she can do?
«13

Comments

  • grumbler
    grumbler Posts: 58,629 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    nats78 wrote: »
    Are the bank allowed to do this?
    Stupid ill-thought AML regulations allow them to do pretty much anything they want.
    What Are the steps they have to follow?
    The second option is faster, so it would be my personal choice.
  • colsten
    colsten Posts: 17,597 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    What is the name of the gambling website?
  • nats78
    nats78 Posts: 20 Forumite
    It was Costa bingo
  • GingerBob_3
    GingerBob_3 Posts: 3,659 Forumite
    When you get your money close the account, and tell them in no uncertain terms why you're doing so. B***rds!
  • ChiefGrasscutter
    ChiefGrasscutter Posts: 2,112 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    grumbler wrote: »
    Stupid ill-thought AML regulations allow them to do pretty much anything they want.

    The second option is faster, so it would be my personal choice.


    the second option will be thrown out by the court if you have not gone all the way though the regulation complaints proceedure of the bank and the FOS and reached no 'agreement'.
  • Double_V
    Double_V Posts: 912 Forumite
    Not for this long, I don't think they can do this.
    As mentioned, second option and get on with the letter.
    Once paid, close the account with that bank, they don't deserve you as a customer and your money.
  • ChiefGrasscutter
    ChiefGrasscutter Posts: 2,112 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    The bank has 8 weeks to resolve a complaint.
    If you have failed after the 8 weeks (or the bank has issued a deadlock letter prior) to come to an agreement THEN you can go to the FOS.

    Edit - the 8 weeks is from the date of the complaint - not from the date of the issue arising.
  • grumbler
    grumbler Posts: 58,629 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 8 July 2015 at 10:16AM
    the second option will be thrown out by the court if you have not gone all the way though the regulation complaints proceedure of the bank and the FOS and reached no 'agreement'.
    Any facts proving that one can't go to a court without going to FOS first?
    The bank has 8 weeks to resolve a complaint.
    If you have failed after the 8 weeks (or the bank has issued a deadlock letter prior) to come to an agreement THEN you can go to the FOS.

    Edit - the 8 weeks is from the date of the complaint - not from the date of the issue arising.
    8 weeks are set by the FOS.
    There is no any strict timeframe for a LBA. It's just 'reasonable' time, and 8 weeks is not reasonable IMO, especially after dragging their feet for 5/6 weeks.
  • ChiefGrasscutter
    ChiefGrasscutter Posts: 2,112 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 8 July 2015 at 10:39AM
    Try this @Grumbler from no better authority than citizens advice....

    https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/consumer/taking-action-about-consumer-problems/legal-action/settling-out-of-court/using-alternative-dispute-resolution-adr/

    (Edit - you need to cut and paste link into a new tab on my browser - clicking the link seems not to work!)

    You are expected by the court to have used the relevant regulated industry ADR scheme (FOS for financial matters prior to taking court action)

    You can certainly go to court if you want to prior - but don't expect to get very far -particularly if you cannot explain to the court why you are not willing to use the FOS.
  • grumbler
    grumbler Posts: 58,629 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 8 July 2015 at 10:45AM
    Your link doesn't work for me, and CAB isn't a very reliable source IMO, but possibly you are right.

    That said, in this case I can easily explain the court that that I am not willing to use FOS because it's 100% unreasonable after waiting for 5/6 weeks for my money to spend 8 more weeks on waiting and then even longer (unknown time) while FOS make their mind.

    It's far more reasonable to give the bank 1-2 weeks to release the money or face legal actions otherwise.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.