PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.

Increasing the supply of affordable housing

UKParliament
UKParliament Posts: 749 Organisation Representative
Seventh Anniversary 100 Posts Photogenic Combo Breaker
edited 25 June 2015 at 3:40PM in House buying, renting & selling
Hi MSE's

On Thursday 25 June at approximately 1.30pm the House of Lords will be debating increasing the supply of affordable housing.

This debate has been proposed by Lord Whitty.

You will be able to watch live or via catch-up on Parliament TV.

If you would like to find out more here are some documents produced by the House of Commons Library.

Key Issues for the 2015 Parliament
Affordable Rents (England)
Extending home ownership: Government initiatives
Housing Market: Key Economic Indicators
Building the new private rented sector: issues and prospects (England)

What do you think the biggest issues are in increasing the supply of affordable housing?

Lucinda and Jo
Official Organisation Representative
I’m the official organisation rep for the House of Commons. I do not work for or represent the government. I am politically impartial and cannot comment on government policy. Find out more in DOT's Mission Statement.

MSE has given permission for me to post letting you know about relevant and useful info. You can see my name on the organisations with permission to post list. If you believe I've broken the Forum Rules please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com. This does NOT imply any form of approval of my organisation by MSE
«1345

Comments

  • Pixie5740
    Pixie5740 Posts: 14,515 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Eighth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    The House of Lords, a parliament where none of the members have been democratically elected.

    Stop fiddling with the housing market. Right to Buy. Help to Buy. Just stop. The government's meddling isn't helping.
  • Browntoa
    Browntoa Posts: 49,591 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    stop selling council/social housing stock at a discount

    offer tenants who want to purchase a large bonded deposit instead
    Ex forum ambassador

    Long term forum member
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 7,323 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 22 June 2015 at 12:24PM
    It just isn't possible to increase the supply of social housing in a meaningful way by building new stock..,there isn't the money or land available for the needed large scale building.

    LA rents could be increased. Housing Associations tend to charge more .., they can let places at affordable rents instead of social housing rent rates, which I assume means more money to build more houses.

    Reduce the need for social housing stock by introducing more laws giving tenants more rights to longer leases as standard.., as is happening in other areas of the UK. It happens in Europe, it can be introduced here.

    Yes, remove right to buy.., yes harsher penalties for people not using council properties but renting them out privately, yes to employing more people to bring back into use empty properties (it can take two years to compulsory purchase an empty property, giving the owner initially time to do the necessary refurb work himself etc).

    More money to encourage tenants living in too large houses to move. At present in my area, its £500, which might just about cover moving costs. Not much of an incentive, and there aren't enough smaller properties for people who could move to transfer to. When I was looking at moving in 1999 you received several thousand pounds, sometimes enough for a deposit on buying a place. It did motivate people to move and is a lot cheaper than building a property.

    No doubt that more social housing is needed.., but at this point in time, not easy to do.
  • Cornucopia
    Cornucopia Posts: 16,437 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 22 June 2015 at 12:38PM
    Eco-building on land that is loaned/leased from Government and other large landowners.

    An eco-build can cost as little as £40k for materials, £40k for labour (when constructing a number of houses). So if the land costs little or nothing, the resulting rents could be very affordable.

    Eco-houses also tend to be faster to build - taking weeks rather than months.
  • stator
    stator Posts: 7,441 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    The problem is that house building has been left entirely in the hands of private companies, with housing associations picking up 'scraps' left to them as a result of new developments.
    What is needed is a return to the age of council lead building. If the council identifies and compulsory purchases the land it can sell off plots to house builders and make a profit to invest in more house building.
    Any other schemes will just be tinkering around at the edges and not help matters.
    Changing the world, one sarcastic comment at a time.
  • TrickyDicky101
    TrickyDicky101 Posts: 3,529 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    stator wrote: »
    What is needed is a return to the age of council lead building. If the council identifies and compulsory purchases the land it can sell off plots to house builders and make a profit to invest in more house building.

    So you're advocating capital confiscation (otherwise known as 'naionalisation' or, more accurately, 'theft') from unlucky landowners?

    I like not living under a communist regime so no thank you.
  • stator
    stator Posts: 7,441 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    So you're advocating capital confiscation (otherwise known as 'naionalisation' or, more accurately, 'theft') from unlucky landowners?

    I like not living under a communist regime so no thank you.
    Hah, all countries in the world have a mechanism for compulsory purchase of land required for the greater good. If you really wanted to live in a capitalist country all the farms would go bankrupt anyway since that would mean scrapping the CAP / SFP.
    Changing the world, one sarcastic comment at a time.
  • Malmo
    Malmo Posts: 710 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    The proposed policy to extend Right to Buy to housing association tenants is highly flawed, unfair and will do nothing to help improve the supply of affordable housing. Properties that are sold off will not be replaced one-for-one. It simply won't happen.

    Firstly, Housing Associations are private, independent charities. Forcing them to sell their property assets at below market value could potentially breach Article 1, Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which gives everyone the “right to the peaceful enjoyment of one’s possessions”. This includes Housing Associations.

    Secondly, HAs hold property as assets in trust for their communities and these assets must be managed responsibly and properly. Disposing of charity assets below market value would be difficult or impossible under Charity Law as charities must get the best deal or approval from the Charity Commission. The law itself and how the commission works would need to be amended.

    Stop launching schemes that drive more demand and solve the actual problem - lack of supply.
  • JencParker
    JencParker Posts: 983 Forumite
    Restrictions on property that can be sold to overseas buyers/companies.


    Longer life time leases for tenants in rented property.


    Large penalties for property that remains unoccupied for more than 6 months.


    No second home discounts - in fact, tax on second homes.

    No selling off of council or housing association property.


    However, if Right to Buy were to apply then it should apply to ALL rented property.
  • C_Mababejive
    C_Mababejive Posts: 11,668 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    I want HM Government to STOP meddling in the housing market.

    I want them to create conditions/legislate to make more land available for housebuilding decent homes,not overpriced shoe boxes


    I want Government to change the way social housing queues are prioritised to make length of time on the queue a greater priority over housing need.
    Feudal Britain needs land reform. 70% of the land is "owned" by 1 % of the population and at least 50% is unregistered (inherited by landed gentry). Thats why your slave box costs so much..
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 349.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453K Spending & Discounts
  • 242.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 619.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.4K Life & Family
  • 255.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.