ANPR Ltd - Assistance Needed.

bazster

The crucial "detail" is that this is one of Trev's stupid trespass claims. Since he isn't the landowner he hasn't a hope of making it stick and probably will not even show up if you succeed in getting it set aside.

gravyguy50

No i never got a popla code - i aslo have all the telephone calls recorded in which they say they don't have to give it me because they are not member of BPA or words to that effect.

I've cross posted here.
http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?showtopic=99143

ColliesCarer

Hi gravyguy50

I've sent you a pm

enfield_freddy

the parasites will soon be gone


anyone ever heard of a counsil managing to organise a meeting as quick as this


Good morning Mr. xxxx,
Thank you for your recent email. I have called together a meeting of all relevant officers tomorrow to discuss the actions of ANPR Ltd. I will update you accordingly.


Kind regards Caron.

---

Original Message

---

From: Alan xxxxx COLOR=#0066cc]mailto:sxxxxxx.com[/COLOR Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 10:47 AM To: Caron Parmenter Subject: ANPR Ltd

waamo

If Trev is claiming for trespass he could be in a spot of bother. He isn't the landowner or have any interest in the land. In other words he is the landowners agent. He would have to bring action in the name of the injured party.

To bring court action on behalf of someone else you have to be a lawyer. It's a legal requirement and a criminal offence to act in a privalaged manner if you aren't entitled to do so. It will be really interesting to see the particulars of claim.

enfield_freddy

and I get the idea that Preston CC , after reading MSE and Pepipoo , will deny his authority to press charges , they are now wondering about there liabilities as his employer


they have been informed that he is not in a APPROVED ta , but yet they think (or have been conned) into believing the CSA is an APPROVED ta with regard to parking and trespass,


they were warned on the 15th of may that this was the case (see pranky 21st may) but decided to go







having seen the above papers (yes they have!) , they are now VERY VERY worried of an more court claims after 1st april ,


T Whitehouse only method of DVLA access is


1: CSA , illegal


2: v888/2 ,, not applicable or acceptable for a parking Co , must use recognised ATA


due to attitude , I hope it hurts them when people counter claim and inc them in there claims




I am getting close , very close to him loosing 8 car parks in Preston , with the paper trail , I only hope that other members tell the other car park owners

nigelbb

enfield_freddy wrote: »

T Whitehouse only method of DVLA access is


1: CSA , illegal

2: v888/2 ,, not applicable or acceptable for a parking Co , must use recognised ATA

3: Use a stooge to submit V888 requests as a private individual

V888 is for a private individual to request name and address of the registered keeper at a specific date https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/417442/V888_200315.pdf
V888/2 is for a company to request name and address of the registered keeper at a specific date https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/390562/V888X2_241114.pdf
V888/3 is for a company which issues parking charge notices to request name and address of the registered keeper at a specific date
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/414973/V888X3_050315.pdf

In the case of a V888/3 it states on the form:-

If you are a car parking or wheelclamping company you must be a member of an Accredited Trade Association (ATA) to request information from DVLA either electronically or by post, otherwise we will reject your request for information

enfield_freddy

yes , that info was received from brian dodge of the DVLA , the email was forwarded to PCC and the could not give a dam




just sat there going




Robert Boswell

Labour councillor - Tulketh Ward

Portfolio Holder - Communities and Environment

Tele: 01772 727306

Preston City Council

and Governance Director at PCC. now been added to the list of "guests" at a quickly organised meeting tomorrow,




"if there are any claims post 1st april they have been forwarned that counter claims will be made including them as ANPRs employer


16 phone calls received today from


DVLA , BPA, PCC , CSA , and several emails from local paper ,


they were warned that whitehouse was breaking the law but chose to go

gravyguy50

btw. Very thankful for everyone's input.

enfield_freddy

gravyguy50 wrote: »

btw. Very thankful for everyone's input.

how about getting PCC to pay the charge , threats as in the ones above can be used , you WILL include PCC in any counter claim , if he objects or tries again , and you DO expect PCC to pay all costs (inc £155) as they were informed many weeks ago about his illegal activities on there car parks