We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Beavis appeal fund launched
Options
Comments
-
PE_Watching_U wrote: »So why would Parking Eye waive their costs if Beavis loses yet again? It's likely the initial target will be reached, but who will remortgage their house to pay the costs of PE when they win again?
On the small claims track ?0 -
Its that what its cost PE already, glad to hear it. when he wins someones out on their backside.PE_Watching_U wrote: »So why would Parking Eye waive their costs if Beavis loses yet again? It's likely the initial target will be reached, but who will remortgage their house to pay the costs of PE when they win again?0 -
PE_Watching_U wrote: »So why would Parking Eye waive their costs if Beavis loses yet again? It's likely the initial target will be reached, but who will remortgage their house to pay the costs of PE when they win again?
AIUI costs are only awarded on the small claims track if one party behaves unreasonably. Having been given permission to appeal both to the CoA and Supreme Court that is pretty unlikely0 -
salmosalaris wrote: »AIUI costs are only awarded on the small claims track if one party behaves unreasonably. Having been given permission to appeal both to the CoA and Supreme Court that is pretty unlikely
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2014/943.html
Also Graham v Sand Martin Heights 0BQ 12347, where our old friend HHJ Moloney ruled in 2011Dedicated to driving up standards in parking0 -
I'm surprised our friend didn't suggest costs would be in the order of the price of a London suburban semi increasing to those of a detached if not paid within 14 days0
-
Contributed x:heartpuls Mrs Marleyboy :heartpuls
MSE: many of the benefits of a helpful family, without disadvantages like having to compete for the tv remote
Proud Parents to an Aut-some son 0 -
Happy to. The help I've had on here is invaluable and the outcome could affect everyone. Best of luck Barry, fair play for sticking with it.0
-
PE_Watching_U wrote: »They are glad as well, think how many more wins they will get when they mention the CoA result.
erm...every 'win' costs them £200 for an LPC Law representative.
So the more wins they get, the more money they lose. Have they actually stopped to consider their true position yet?Dedicated to driving up standards in parking0 -
PE_Watching_U wrote: »They are glad as well, think how many more wins they will get when they mention the CoA result.
he who laughs last ....0 -
salmosalaris wrote: »he who laughs last ....
Didn't get the joke?Dedicated to driving up standards in parking0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards