We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Beavis appeal fund launched
Options
Comments
-
Ah yes ....
Just realised .. no pun intended on "chip" ... :rotfl:0 -
I'm happy to throw a tenner in too. Just to see the PPC scumbags squirm.We’ve had to remove your signature because your opinion differs from ours. Please check the Forum Rules if you’re unsure why you can not have your own opinion on here and, if still unsure, email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com0
-
Contribution made!Je suis Charlie0
-
First ever post on the site. I'm in. Good luck0
-
Sent my contribution 0
-
Getting there now at 25%, this will hit the total in a few days!0
-
I'll be contributing some cash in the near future as this forum has helped to successfully fight off 2 ParkingEye PCN's which friends received for overstaying by 7 minutes.
This might be a daft question, and feel free to ridicule me if so, but why hasn't Parking Prankster ever had his say in these high court appearances?
Pretty sure he'd be more clued up about specific private parking rules and regulations than any old barrister chosen.0 -
Indeed he would, as would others.Freddy_Fazbear wrote: »Pretty sure he'd be more clued up about specific private parking rules and regulations than any old barrister chosen.
But in the Court of Appeal, only a barrister, or a solicitor with higher rights of audience, may address their Learned Lordships.
The legal profession doesn't want any old armchair lawyers or assorted riff-raff cluttering up their courts.
I have been providing assistance, including Lay Representation at Court hearings (current score: won 57, lost 14), to defendants in parking cases for over 5 years. I have an LLB (Hons) degree, and have a Graduate Diploma in Civil Litigation from CILEx. However, any advice given on these forums by me is NOT formal legal advice, and I accept no liability for its accuracy.0 -
Indeed he would, as would others.
But in the Court of Appeal, only a barrister, or a solicitor with higher rights of audience, may address their Learned Lordships.
The legal profession doesn't want any old armchair lawyers or assorted riff-raff cluttering up their courts.
Thanks, Bargepole. Makes sense now. I agree other people would know more as well, yourself included. Anyway, good luck :beer:0 -
My ignore list grows.
Even the i.d. is a lie.CAP[UK]for FREE EXPERT DEBT &BUDGET HELP:
01274 760721, freephone0800 328 0006'People don't want much. They want: "Someone to love, somewhere to live, somewhere to work and something to hope for."
Norman Kirk, NZLP- Prime Minister, 1972
***JE SUIS CHARLIE***
'It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere' François-Marie AROUET
0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards