CEL , 31/03 , aberdeen

enfield_freddy

If it goes tits up for them tomorrow , will they "actually" be expelled from there ATA ?


is it the company name , or the directors that are struck off ?


can the directors be banned from running other companies?


how many other companies have they registered with ATAs




any live feeds from the court?

bod1467

If it goes tits up for them tomorrow , will they "actually" be expelled from there ATA ?
That's up to the ATA.

is it the company name , or the directors that are struck off ?
The company can be issued a winding-up order, and the persons banned from holding director positions in other companies.

can the directors be banned from running other companies?
Yes, at the court's behest. Not sure if a Scottish ruling would apply to the rest of the UK though.

how many other companies have they registered with ATAs
No idea.

any live feeds from the court?
Not unless someone is there with their mobile to give a Twitter feed.

trisontana

When OPC were convicted a Wolverhampton a couple of years ago nothing happened to them regarding the BPA Ltd. They are still members of that august institution.

ManxRed

Pol Pot would be welcomed as a member of the BPA Ltd.

He'd be made chairman of the IPC.

bazster

enfield_freddy wrote: »

If it goes tits up for them tomorrow , will they "actually" be expelled from there ATA ?

You are joking, right? The Bullsh|t Purveyors' Association already happily harbours convicted criminals among its membership, what's one more?

enfield_freddy wrote: »

is it the company name , or the directors that are struck off ?

The director (singular) is a shady South African stooge who has nothing to do with running the company. Sanctions against him will likely be unenforceable and will have no effect on the people who really run the company.

The two individuals who really run the company could be subject to criminal charges, but only if the prosecutor in Scotland has sufficient evidence that they are the "controlling minds and wills" behind the company. They have certainly been tipped off as to their identities.

enfield_freddy wrote: »

can the directors be banned from running other companies?

See above

enfield_freddy wrote: »

how many other companies have they registered with ATAs

The stooge is a director of 140 companies. Can't be bothered to look through them all. So what anyway? Being a criminal is no obstacle to being an ATA member.

enfield_freddy wrote: »

any live feeds from the court?

Not a chance. It's hardly the trial of Oscar Pistorious!

bod1467

Any update yet? Has it started?

liftingthelid

If you are so interested why have you not gone to the hearing?

ManxRed

The judge has sent out to chambers for his black cap before he passes sentence.

Is what I heard.

Hot_Bring

liftingthelid wrote: »

If you are so interested why have you not gone to the hearing?

Is it Tuesday or Trollsday ??

I take it you don't know where Aberdeen is ?

liftingthelid

Hot_Bring wrote: »

Is it Tuesday or Trollsday ??

I take it you don't know where Aberdeen is ?

The location of Aberdeen is a poor excuse for people so interested in this but dont go...

Hot_Bring

liftingthelid wrote: »

The location of Aberdeen is a poor excuse for people so interested in this but dont go...

Go on, you work for CEL don't you ?

Why would anyone not directly involved in the case bother to pay to get to Aberdeen ( from Brighton in my case ) when the details will be freely available a little later ? Typical PPC economic thinking from you there !