We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

pranksters blog tonight

13

Comments

  • enfield_freddy
    enfield_freddy Posts: 6,147 Forumite
    bazster wrote: »
    Is that a reason for not doing it now?


    election due perhaps?
  • bazster
    bazster Posts: 7,436 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    election due perhaps?

    Well we don't know what (if anything) is going to come of this yet, but electioneering may be behind it.
    Je suis Charlie.
  • System
    System Posts: 178,371 Community Admin
    10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Makes as much sense as putting the roads network under the scrutiny of the Rail Regulator.

    http://orr.gov.uk/news-and-media/email-alerts/2014/dft-announces-new-monitoring-function-for-englands-strategic-road-network

    But you get the politicians you vote for
    This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com
  • The_Deep
    The_Deep Posts: 16,830 Forumite
    Someone needs to put a stop to the practice of letting agents charging huge fees to tenants.

    The LA charges the Landlord between 7-15% of 6-12 months rent. I am not aware of any charging tenants "huge" fees, but they have to charge for credit checks, referencing, tenancy agreements etc..
    You never know how far you can go until you go too far.
  • bazster
    bazster Posts: 7,436 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    The_Deep wrote: »
    Someone needs to put a stop to the practice of letting agents charging huge fees to tenants.

    The LA charges the Landlord between 7-15% of 6-12 months rent. I am not aware of any charging tenants "huge" fees, but they have to charge for credit checks, referencing, tenancy agreements etc..

    No they don't. Those costs should be covered out of what the agent receives from his principal, the landlord. To have the agent charging his costs to someone other than his principal simply invites rip-offs: there is no incentive for the agent to keep those charges honest and reasonable, and as a result many profiteer shamelessly.

    If I buy a house I don't pay the estate agent for his or the seller's admin or legal costs do I? That's down to them, after all I have no contractual relationship with the agent, he's not my agent!
    Je suis Charlie.
  • spikyone
    spikyone Posts: 456 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    The_Deep wrote: »
    Someone needs to put a stop to the practice of letting agents charging huge fees to tenants.

    The LA charges the Landlord between 7-15% of 6-12 months rent. I am not aware of any charging tenants "huge" fees, but they have to charge for credit checks, referencing, tenancy agreements etc..



    Completely off-topic, but I'll bite - if you think that changing the name on a bog-standard tenancy agreement costs anything like the amount that LAs charge, you're deluded. Likewise credit checks and "referencing", which involves about two minutes of actual work. The whole lot usually runs to hundreds of pounds for tenants.


    Frankly, letting agents are barely a step above PPCs in terms of being less-than-honest in their business practices and downright greedy. There, back on topic...
  • Herzlos
    Herzlos Posts: 16,047 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    The_Deep wrote: »
    Someone needs to put a stop to the practice of letting agents charging huge fees to tenants.

    The LA charges the Landlord between 7-15% of 6-12 months rent. I am not aware of any charging tenants "huge" fees, but they have to charge for credit checks, referencing, tenancy agreements etc..

    So what do they do for the 7-15% of the rent, if it doesn't involve any of the work involved in changing tennants? From what I've heard (no first hand experience) the credit check fees are enormous (£100+) for what can't cost them anywhere near that and seems to be virtually extortion because you need to do it to get the lease.
  • bod1467
    bod1467 Posts: 15,214 Forumite
    ok thanks for the non sarcastic answer


    cheers


    alan

    I wasn't being sarcastic ... I genuinely thought you were struggling to understand what the expression meant.

    Perhaps if you took more care in composing your posts such misunderstandings would not occur? (You know - things like sentence structure, capitalisation where necessary, etc. This isn't IM - people are allowed to take time composing posts here).
  • bod1467
    bod1467 Posts: 15,214 Forumite
    spikyone wrote: »
    Completely off-topic, but I'll bite - if you think that changing the name on a bog-standard tenancy agreement costs anything like the amount that LAs charge, you're deluded. Likewise credit checks and "referencing", which involves about two minutes of actual work. The whole lot usually runs to hundreds of pounds for tenants.


    Frankly, letting agents are barely a step above PPCs in terms of being less-than-honest in their business practices and downright greedy. There, back on topic...

    Pretty much for every prospective tenant ... whether you get the rental or not.
  • The_Deep
    The_Deep Posts: 16,830 Forumite
    As a landlord, I know very little about LAs charges to tenants. However, I am familiar with what they charge me. £500-600 for finding a tenant, a bit more for collecting rent, £1000 - 1500 + actuals for full management, all plus va.t. All tax deductible.

    I prefer to use an LA because if things go wrong I can sue them, also they can organise inventories, check ins and outs, deposits etc. Good tenants can negotiate with LAs, those who get ripped off are usually not the sort I want in my properties anyway.,
    You never know how far you can go until you go too far.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.